These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16913943)

  • 1. Humans prefer curved visual objects.
    Bar M; Neta M
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Aug; 17(8):645-8. PubMed ID: 16913943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation.
    Bar M; Neta M
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jun; 45(10):2191-200. PubMed ID: 17462678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emotional valence modulates the preference for curved objects.
    Leder H; Tinio PP; Bar M
    Perception; 2011; 40(6):649-55. PubMed ID: 21936294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repetition suppression in occipital-temporal visual areas is modulated by physical rather than semantic features of objects.
    Chouinard PA; Morrissey BF; Köhler S; Goodale MA
    Neuroimage; 2008 May; 41(1):130-44. PubMed ID: 18375148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Newborn infant attention to form of contour.
    Fantz RL; Miranda SB
    Child Dev; 1975 Mar; 46(1):224-8. PubMed ID: 1132272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Very first impressions.
    Bar M; Neta M; Linz H
    Emotion; 2006 May; 6(2):269-78. PubMed ID: 16768559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can Hospital Form Trigger Fear Response?
    Pati D; O'Boyle M; Hou J; Nanda U; Ghamari H
    HERD; 2016 Apr; 9(3):162-75. PubMed ID: 26747839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accessible attitudes influence categorization of multiply categorizable objects.
    Smith ER; Fazio RH; Cejka MA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1996 Nov; 71(5):888-98. PubMed ID: 8939039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The structure of three-dimensional object representations in human vision: evidence from whole-part matching.
    Leek EC; Reppa I; Arguin M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Aug; 31(4):668-84. PubMed ID: 16131241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The group-contagion effect: the influence of spatial groupings on perceived contagion and preferences.
    Mishra A; Mishra H; Nayakankuppam D
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jul; 20(7):867-70. PubMed ID: 19493323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Independent sampling of features enables conscious perception of bound objects.
    Vul E; Rich AN
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Aug; 21(8):1168-75. PubMed ID: 20631320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of presentation time on preference for curvature of real objects and meaningless novel patterns.
    Corradi G; Rosselló-Mir J; Vañó J; Chuquichambi E; Bertamini M; Munar E
    Br J Psychol; 2019 Nov; 110(4):670-685. PubMed ID: 30536967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual-object ability: a new dimension of non-verbal intelligence.
    Blazhenkova O; Kozhevnikov M
    Cognition; 2010 Dec; 117(3):276-301. PubMed ID: 20887982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neurophysiological evidence for the time course of activation of global shape, part, and local contour representations during visual object categorization and memory.
    Schendan HE; Kutas M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 May; 19(5):734-49. PubMed ID: 17488201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Common Visual Preference for Curved Contours in Humans and Great Apes.
    Munar E; Gómez-Puerto G; Call J; Nadal M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0141106. PubMed ID: 26558754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual judgment of similarity across shape transformations: evidence for a compositional model of articulated objects.
    Barenholtz E; Tarr MJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):331-8. PubMed ID: 18466857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The path of visual attention.
    Brown JM; Breitmeyer BG; Leighty KA; Denney HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 16321354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding the referential nature of looking: infants' preference for object-directed gaze.
    Senju A; Csibra G; Johnson MH
    Cognition; 2008 Aug; 108(2):303-19. PubMed ID: 18371943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Object-sensitive activity reflects earlier perceptual and later cognitive processing of visual objects between 95 and 500ms.
    Schendan HE; Lucia LC
    Brain Res; 2010 May; 1329():124-41. PubMed ID: 20122902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A case for inhibition: visual attention suppresses the processing of irrelevant objects.
    Wühr P; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Feb; 137(1):116-30. PubMed ID: 18248132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.