These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16915135)
21. The peer-review process in medical publishing: a reviewer's perspective. Sellke FW J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Dec; 126(6):1683-5. PubMed ID: 14688671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The Internet and the Journal. Goldwein JW; Benjamin I N Engl J Med; 1995 Oct; 333(16):1078; author reply 1079-80. PubMed ID: 7675057 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. All the sourcing not fit to print: citing electronic material in your article. Rice J Chest; 2008 Jun; 133(6):1524-1526. PubMed ID: 18574300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Towards a new horizon. Mrowietz U Arch Dermatol Res; 2008 Jan; 300(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17960401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Trends and future challenges in medical editing. Akhtar J J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2011 Jan; 21(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 21276375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Ousted creationist sues over website. Brumfiel G Nature; 2002 Dec; 420(6916):597. PubMed ID: 12478256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The crisis in scholarly publishing: open access to the rescue? Oren GA J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18347450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Science in the web age: joint efforts. Butler D Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7068):548-9. PubMed ID: 16319855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Critics blast 'premature' paper on adult stem cells. Schiermeier Q; Leeb M Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6992):590. PubMed ID: 15190319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Structure and format of peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts. Manske PR J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Sep; 31(7):1051-5. PubMed ID: 16945702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The self-archiving initiative. Harnad S Nature; 2001 Apr; 410(6832):1024-5. PubMed ID: 11323640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Evolutionary trends in peer review. Morey A; Garner A; Faruque F; Yang G J Allied Health; 2011; 40(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 21927782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Trend analysis of disaster health articles in peer-reviewed publications pre- and post-9/11. Kelen G; Sauer LM Am J Disaster Med; 2008; 3(6):369-76. PubMed ID: 19202890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Entire-paper plagiarism caught by software. Butler D Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7214):715. PubMed ID: 18843325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The Internet and the Journal. Finegold L N Engl J Med; 1995 Oct; 333(16):1079; author reply 1079-80. PubMed ID: 7675060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Peer review: is it a social process? Quintana LM World Neurosurg; 2011; 76(1-2):41-2. PubMed ID: 21839939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Plan U: Universal access to scientific and medical research via funder preprint mandates. Sever R; Eisen M; Inglis J PLoS Biol; 2019 Jun; 17(6):e3000273. PubMed ID: 31163026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A challenge for scientific medical journals: quest for the holy p-pub/e-pub balance. Wagner GS J Electrocardiol; 2006 Apr; 39(2):133-4. PubMed ID: 16580406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]