166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16915306)
1. [Too good to be true].
Haug C
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Aug; 126(15):1891. PubMed ID: 16915306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Big and small research fraud].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Aug; 126(16):2089. PubMed ID: 16932774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Peer review and scientific misconduct: bad authors and trusting reviewers.
Malay DS
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2009; 48(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 19423027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Responding to fraud.
Kennedy D
Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5804):1353. PubMed ID: 17138870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Hwang case review committee misses the mark.
Rossner M
J Cell Biol; 2007 Jan; 176(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 17210952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Editors and publishing: integrity, trust and faith.
Freshwater D
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2006 Feb; 13(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16441386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy and integrity include hearing both sides.
Wylie DT
Optometry; 2010 Sep; 81(9):429. PubMed ID: 20728819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Copy is fraudulent--but what is the consequence?].
Nielsen OH; Schroeder TV
Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Nov; 168(45):3891. PubMed ID: 17118247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Publication ethics.
Freeman PB
Optometry; 2010 Apr; 81(4):167-8. PubMed ID: 20346886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative].
Werkö L
Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Publication ethics.
Hays JC
Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dealing with editorial misconduct: what about relationship with reviewers and authors?
Laube RE
BMJ; 2005 Feb; 330(7487):364. PubMed ID: 15705711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reactions to the Hwang scandal.
Martin TJ
Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5761):606-7. PubMed ID: 16459361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [When the editor makes an error].
Hem E
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Oct; 128(20):2303. PubMed ID: 19096482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The manuscript review process.
Triadafilopoulos G
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Dec; 64(6 Suppl):S23-5. PubMed ID: 17113850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Misconduct in scientific publishing.
Chan DL
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2011 Jun; 21(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 21631701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A Statement on Ethics From the HEART Group.
HEART Group
Circ Res; 2008 May; 102(9):e104-5. PubMed ID: 18467635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Authorship and co-authorship].
Haug C
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Feb; 126(4):429. PubMed ID: 16477275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A statement on ethics from the HEART group.
HEART Group
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 May; 71(6):859-61. PubMed ID: 18412086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. If it's too good to be true, it probably is.
Kennedy MS
Am J Nurs; 2009 Dec; 109(12):7. PubMed ID: 19935148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
