These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16915632)
1. Development of a multicriteria assessment model for ranking biomass feedstock collection and transportation systems. Kumar A; Sokhansanj S; Flynn PC Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2006; 129-132():71-87. PubMed ID: 16915632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rail vs truck transport of biomass. Mahmudi H; Flynn PC Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2006; 129-132():88-103. PubMed ID: 16915633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Availability of crop residues as sustainable feedstock for bioethanol production in North Carolina. Shahbazi A; Li Y Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2006; 129-132():41-54. PubMed ID: 16915630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Agricultural residue availability in the United States. Haq Z; Easterly JL Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2006; 129-132():3-21. PubMed ID: 16915628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Switchgrass (Panicum vigratum, L.) delivery to a biorefinery using integrated biomass supply analysis and logistics (IBSAL) model. Kumar A; Sokhansanj S Bioresour Technol; 2007 Mar; 98(5):1033-44. PubMed ID: 16797978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relative cost of biomass energy transport. Searcy E; Flynn P; Ghafoori E; Kumar A Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2007 Apr; 137-140(1-12):639-52. PubMed ID: 18478422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Updates on softwood-to-ethanol process development. Mabee WE; Gregg DJ; Arato C; Berlin A; Bura R; Gilkes N; Mirochnik O; Pan X; Pye EK; Saddler JN Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2006; 129-132():55-70. PubMed ID: 16915631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Should we transport coal, gas, or electricity: cost, efficiency, and environmental implications. Bergerson JA; Lave LB Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Aug; 39(16):5905-10. PubMed ID: 16173545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of agri-pellet production cost and optimum size. Sultana A; Kumar A; Harfield D Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jul; 101(14):5609-21. PubMed ID: 20189801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Large-scale ethanol fermentation through pipeline delivery of biomass. Kumar A; Cameron JB; Flynn PC Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2005; 121-124():47-58. PubMed ID: 15917586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Environmental and economic evaluation of bioenergy in Ontario, Canada. Zhang Y; Habibi S; MacLean HL J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2007 Aug; 57(8):919-33. PubMed ID: 17824282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biofuels, land, and water: a systems approach to sustainability. Gopalakrishnan G; Negri MC; Wang M; Wu M; Snyder SW; Lafreniere L Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Aug; 43(15):6094-100. PubMed ID: 19731724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Significance and limitations of first generation biofuels]. Gabrielle B J Soc Biol; 2008; 202(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 18980738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Potential synergies and challenges in refining cellulosic biomass to fuels, chemicals, and power. Wyman CE Biotechnol Prog; 2003; 19(2):254-62. PubMed ID: 12675557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bio-oil transport by pipeline: a techno-economic assessment. Pootakham T; Kumar A Bioresour Technol; 2010 Sep; 101(18):7148-54. PubMed ID: 20434906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Potential environmental benefits from increased use of bioenergy in China. Fan S; Freedman B; Gao J Environ Manage; 2007 Sep; 40(3):504-15. PubMed ID: 17638052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Scaling laws and technology development strategies for biorefineries and bioenergy plants. Jack MW Bioresour Technol; 2009 Dec; 100(24):6324-30. PubMed ID: 19635662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]