BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

983 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16916668)

  • 1. Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in outpatient third molar surgery.
    Ustün Y; Gündüz M; Erdoğan O; Benlidayi ME
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 64(9):1353-8. PubMed ID: 16916668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for sedation in third molar surgery.
    Cheung CW; Ying CL; Chiu WK; Wong GT; Ng KF; Irwin MG
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Nov; 62(11):1132-8. PubMed ID: 17924894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of midazolam and midazolam with remifentanil for patient-controlled sedation during operations on third molars.
    Garip H; Gürkan Y; Toker K; Göker K
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 45(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 16930785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of patient-controlled remifentanil application in third molar surgery.
    Esen E; Ustün Y; Balcioğlu YO; Alparslan ZN
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Apr; 63(4):457-63. PubMed ID: 15789316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bispectral index-guided intraoperative sedation with dexmedetomidine and midazolam infusion in outpatient cataract surgery.
    Apan A; Doganci N; Ergan A; Büyükkoçak U
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2009 May; 75(5):239-44. PubMed ID: 19088698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation, pain and hemodynamic control, during colonoscopy under conscious sedation.
    Dere K; Sucullu I; Budak ET; Yeyen S; Filiz AI; Ozkan S; Dagli G
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):648-52. PubMed ID: 20531094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the effects of midazolam/fentanyl and midazolam/tramadol for conscious intravenous sedation during third molar extraction.
    Göktay O; Satilmiş T; Garip H; Gönül O; Göker K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jun; 69(6):1594-9. PubMed ID: 21277062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of recovery in patients undergoing intravenous conscious sedation using bispectral analysis.
    Sandler NA; Hodges J; Sabino M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jun; 59(6):603-11; discussion 611-2. PubMed ID: 11381378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for conscious sedation in dental surgery monitored by bispectral index.
    Fan TW; Ti LK; Islam I
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 51(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 23058230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of midazolam intravenous sedated patient's comfort degree in mandibular third molar surgery].
    Wan K; Jing Q; Liu DY; Zhao JZ; Chen X; Dong YL
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Sep; 42(9):568-9. PubMed ID: 18070439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monitored anesthesia care with dexmedetomidine: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial.
    Candiotti KA; Bergese SD; Bokesch PM; Feldman MA; Wisemandle W; Bekker AY;
    Anesth Analg; 2010 Jan; 110(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 19713256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prolonged recovery associated with dexmedetomidine when used as a sole sedative agent in office-based oral and maxillofacial surgery procedures.
    Makary L; Vornik V; Finn R; Lenkovsky F; McClelland AL; Thurmon J; Robertson B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 68(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 20116712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dexmedetomidine causes prolonged recovery when compared with midazolam/fentanyl combination in outpatient shock wave lithotripsy.
    Zeyneloglu P; Pirat A; Candan S; Kuyumcu S; Tekin I; Arslan G
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Dec; 25(12):961-7. PubMed ID: 18538051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam for premedication in pediatric anesthesia: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
    Yuen VM; Hui TW; Irwin MG; Yuen MK
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Jun; 106(6):1715-21. PubMed ID: 18499600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Phase IIIb, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study evaluating the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine for sedation during awake fiberoptic intubation.
    Bergese SD; Candiotti KA; Bokesch PM; Zura A; Wisemandle W; Bekker AY;
    Am J Ther; 2010; 17(6):586-95. PubMed ID: 20535016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of a bolus of fentanyl with an infusion of alfentanil during target-controlled propofol infusion in third molar extraction under conscious sedation.
    Kwak HJ; Kim JY; Kwak YL; Park WS; Lee KC
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Nov; 64(11):1577-82. PubMed ID: 17052581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of local dexmedetomidine application.
    Cheung CW; Ng KF; Choi WS; Chiu WK; Ying CL; Irwin MG
    Clin J Pain; 2011 Jun; 27(5):377-82. PubMed ID: 21317777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The analgesic efficacy of intravenous versus oral tramadol for preventing postoperative pain after third molar surgery.
    Ong CK; Lirk P; Tan JM; Sow BW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Aug; 63(8):1162-8. PubMed ID: 16094585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of intravenous small dose ketamine and midazolam on postoperative pain following knee arthroscopy.
    Cagla Ozbakis Akkurt B; Inanoglu K; Kalaci A; Turhanoglu S; Asfuroglu Z; Tumkaya F
    Pain Pract; 2009; 9(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 19490462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of analgesic efficacy and clinical acceptability of intravenous tramadol as an adjunct to propofol sedation for third molar surgery.
    Shipton EA; Roelofse JA; Blignaut RJ
    Anesth Prog; 2003; 50(3):121-8. PubMed ID: 14558587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 50.