144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16916804)
1. An assessment of exposure indices in computed radiography for the posterior-anterior chest and the lateral lumbar spine.
Warren-Forward H; Arthur L; Hobson L; Skinner R; Watts A; Clapham K; Lou D; Cook A
Br J Radiol; 2007 Jan; 80(949):26-31. PubMed ID: 16916804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of x-ray tube potential on image quality and patient dose for lumbar spine computed radiography examinations.
Brindhaban A; Al Khalifah K; Al Wathiqi G; Al Ostath H
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Dec; 28(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 16506618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exposure creep in computed radiography: a longitudinal study.
Gibson DJ; Davidson RA
Acad Radiol; 2012 Apr; 19(4):458-62. PubMed ID: 22225727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of patient dose and optimization levels in chest and abdomen CR examinations at referral hospitals in Tanzania.
Masoud AO; Muhogora WE; Msaki PK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):435–441. PubMed ID: 26699324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
Butler ML; Rainford L; Last J; Brennan PC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of patient radiation dose from chest and lumbar spine X-ray examinations in 10 hospitals in Ghana.
Ofori EK; Antwi WK; Arthur L; Duah H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 May; 149(4):424-30. PubMed ID: 21775316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimizing the Exposure Indicator as a Dose Management Strategy in Computed Radiography.
Seeram E; Davidson R; Bushong S; Swan H
Radiol Technol; 2016; 87(4):380-91. PubMed ID: 26952062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Entrance surface doses to patients undergoing selected diagnostic X-ray examinations in Sudan.
Suliman II; Abbas N; Habbani FI
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 16973669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Dose estimation for exposure conditions of diagnostic radiology acquired by a 2011 questionnaire in a phantom study].
Matsunaga Y; Kawaguchi A; Kobayashi K; Asada Y; Takikawa Y; Yamada M; Suzuki S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Dec; 69(12):1372-8. PubMed ID: 24366557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient dose measurements in diagnostic radiology procedures in Montenegro.
Milatović A; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Ivanović S; Jovanović S; Spasić-Jokić V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 May; 149(4):454-63. PubMed ID: 21775317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DETERMINATION OF DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVEL IN ROUTINE EXAMINATIONS OF DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY IN MAZANDARAN PROVINCE.
Hoseini Motlagh Z; Shabestani Monfared A; Deevband MR; Abedi-Firouzjah R; Ghaemian N; Abdi R; Ebrahimnejad Gorji K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Aug; 190(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 32491180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital radiography: are the manufacturers' settings too high? Optimisation of the Kodak digital radiography system with aid of the computed radiography dose index.
Peters SE; Brennan PC
Eur Radiol; 2002 Sep; 12(9):2381-7. PubMed ID: 12195499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lumbar spine radiology: analysis of the posteroanterior projection.
Brennan PC; Madigan E
Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(7):1197-201. PubMed ID: 11003420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of beam tube potential variation on gonad dose to patients during chest radiography investigated using high sensitivity LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescent dosemeters.
Fung KK; Gilboy WB
Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):358-67. PubMed ID: 11387155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A pilot study investigating two dose reduction techniques for AP lumbar spine radiography using direct dosimetry and Projection VR.
Shanahan MC
Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):222-228. PubMed ID: 28687290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient dose measurement in common medical X-ray examinations in Iran.
Rasuli B; Mahmoud-Pashazadeh A; Ghorbani M; Juybari RT; Naserpour M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):374-386. PubMed ID: 26894357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigation of optimum energies for chest imaging using film-screen and computed radiography.
Honey ID; Mackenzie A; Evans DS
Br J Radiol; 2005 May; 78(929):422-7. PubMed ID: 15845936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient dose and image quality in five standard x-ray examinations.
Havukainen R; Pirinen M
Med Phys; 1993; 20(3):813-7. PubMed ID: 8350841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative study of adult patient doses in film screen and computed radiography in some Sudanese hospitals.
Elshiekh E; Suliman II; Habbani F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):402-5. PubMed ID: 25889604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity of coefficients for converting entrance surface dose and kerma-area product to effective dose and energy imparted to the patient.
Wise KN; Sandborg M; Persliden J; Carlsson GA
Phys Med Biol; 1999 Aug; 44(8):1937-54. PubMed ID: 10473206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
