144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16916804)
21. Effect of patient centering on patient dose and image noise in chest CT.
Kaasalainen T; Palmu K; Reijonen V; Kortesniemi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 24951205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Patient dose, image quality and radiographic techniques for common X ray examinations in two Greek hospitals and comparison with European guidelines.
Papadimitriou D; Perris A; Molfetas MG; Panagiotakis N; Manetou A; Tsourouflis G; Vassileva J; Chronopoulos P; Karapanagiotou O; Kottou S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 95(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 11468804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of six phantoms for entrance skin dose evaluation in 11 standard X-ray examinations.
Compagnone G; Pagan L; Bergamini C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2005; 6(1):101-13. PubMed ID: 15770201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. LOW BMI PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY.
Efthymiou FO; Metaxas VI; Dimitroukas CP; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 32043128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Measurement of Entrance Skin Dose and Calculation of Effective Dose for Common Diagnostic X-Ray Examinations in Kashan, Iran.
Aliasgharzadeh A; Mihandoost E; Masoumbeigi M; Salimian M; Mohseni M
Glob J Health Sci; 2015 Feb; 7(5):202-7. PubMed ID: 26156930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Regional survey of entrance surface dose to patients from X-ray examinations in Saudi Arabia.
Saeed MK
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Jun; 38(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 25801149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [CR (Computed Radiography)].
Matsumoto M
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 12766288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of breast shielding outside the field of view on breast entrance surface dose in axial X-ray examinations: a phantom study.
Hurley L; Alashban Y; Albeshan S; England A; McEntee MF
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2023 May; 29(3):555-560. PubMed ID: 37129301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. "Anode heel effect" on patient dose in lumbar spine radiography.
Fung KK; Gilboy WB
Br J Radiol; 2000 May; 73(869):531-6. PubMed ID: 10884750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Proper Management of the Clinical Exposure Index Based on Body Thickness Using Dose Optimization Tools in Digital Chest Radiography: A Phantom Study.
Yoon Y; Park H; Kim J; Kim J; Roh Y; Tanaka N; Morishita J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 34068390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Do CEC guidelines under-utilise the full potential of increasing kVp as a dose-reducing tool?
Doherty P; O'Leary D; Brennan PC
Eur Radiol; 2003 Aug; 13(8):1992-9. PubMed ID: 12942300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Varied tube potential with constant effective dose at lumbar spine radiography using a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H; Persliden J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):240-5. PubMed ID: 15933115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Application of rational practice and technical advances for optimizing radiation dose for chest CT.
Maher MM; Kalra MK; Toth TL; Wittram C; Saini S; Shepard J
J Thorac Imaging; 2004 Jan; 19(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 14712126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Does digital imaging decrease patient dose? A pilot study and review of the literature.
Neofotistou V; Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Vano E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):204-10. PubMed ID: 16464833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. EFFECTIVE DOSE AND RISK ESTIMATES IN ADULT PATIENTS FROM FOUR RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES EXTRAPOLATED OVER TWO POPULATIONS AT SOME SELECTED CENTERS IN LAGOS STATE, NIGERIA.
Balogun FA; Adeyemi FO; Balogun BO; Oketayo OO; Olowookere CJ; Fasan-Odunsi AO
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 187(3):327-337. PubMed ID: 31589322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reference dose levels for patients undergoing common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Irish hospitals.
Johnston DA; Brennan PC
Br J Radiol; 2000 Apr; 73(868):396-402. PubMed ID: 10844865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Optimising automatic exposure control in computed radiography and the impact on patient dose.
Doyle P; Gentle D; Martin CJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):236-9. PubMed ID: 15933114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Optimisation of performance for computed radiography in the West of Scotland.
Singh G; Martin CJ; McCurrach A; Phanco G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013; 154(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 22929555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. ESTIMATION OF ADULT PATIENT DOSES FOR CHEST X-RAY EXAMINATIONS AND COMPARISON WITH DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS (DRLs).
Bas Mor H; Altinsoy N; Söyler I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(3):377-385. PubMed ID: 29741664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
