144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16916804)
41. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult computed tomography examinations: can we estimate organ and effective dose from mean MAS reduction?
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Oikonomou I; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):654-62. PubMed ID: 21673583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Dose optimisation in computed radiography.
Schreiner-Karoussou A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16461522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Exploring the reliability of the exposure index with a range of kV and mAs values: An experimental study.
van Schoonhoven MT; Hayre DCM; England DA
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Dec; 52(4):559-566. PubMed ID: 34602372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Radiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations: a comparison between two methods.
Tsapaki V; Tsalafoutas IA; Chinofoti I; Karageorgi A; Carinou E; Kamenopoulou V; Yakoumakis EN; Koulentianos ED
Br J Radiol; 2007 Feb; 80(950):107-12. PubMed ID: 16885174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A study and optimization of lumbar spine X-ray imaging systems.
McVey G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
Br J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 76(903):177-88. PubMed ID: 12684233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Entrance doses during lateral lumbar spine and antero-posterior abdomen examinations: generator waveform dependence.
Morrison GD; Underwood AC
Br J Radiol; 1995 May; 68(809):491-4. PubMed ID: 7788234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Average radiation exposure values for three diagnostic radiographic examinations.
Rueter FG; Conway BJ; McCrohan JL; Suleiman OH
Radiology; 1990 Nov; 177(2):341-5. PubMed ID: 2217766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. DETERMINATION OF ENTRANCE SURFACE DOSE FOR THREE COMMON PLANAR DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS.
Jeyasugiththan J; Ehalagasthanna GPNT; Hishaam U; Satharasinghe DM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2022 Oct; 198(18):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 36037526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Radiation dose in pelvic imaging.
Brindhaban A; Al Khalifah K
Radiol Technol; 2005; 77(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 16218020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Automatic exposure control in computed tomography--an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers.
Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):625-34. PubMed ID: 20429764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Measurement of effective dose of the assisting person in diagnostic X-ray examination].
Nakamura K; Ide R; Shimizu A; Sanada T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Dec; 60(12):1739-46. PubMed ID: 15614226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 4: Entrance doses achieved during the X-ray examination of the chest].
Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K
Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1082-103. PubMed ID: 19009497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Management of patient doses and diagnostic reference levels in X-ray radiography in Lithuania.
Ziliukas J; Krynke L; Urboniene A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):313-6. PubMed ID: 20211916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Digital chest radiography image quality assessment with dose reduction.
Grewal RK; Young N; Colins L; Karunnaratne N; Sabharwal N
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2012 Mar; 35(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 22302464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Assessment of patient doses in CR examinations throughout a large health region.
Thakur Y; Bjarnason TA; Hammerstrom K; Marchinkow L; Koch T; Aldrich JE
J Digit Imaging; 2012 Feb; 25(1):189-95. PubMed ID: 21547516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A feasibility study on reduction of the entrance-surface dose to neonates by use of a new digital mobile X-ray system.
Utsunomiya S; Monzen H; Akimoto M; Mukumoto N; Ishihara Y; Shiinoki T; Nakamura M; Miyabe Y; Sato S; Matsuo S; Hiraoka M
Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jan; 6(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 23086629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. ACR White Paper-Based Comprehensive Dose Reduction Initiative Is Associated With a Reversal of the Upward Trend in Radiation Dose for Chest CT.
Rawat U; Cohen SL; Levsky JM; Haramati LB
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Dec; 12(12 Pt A):1251-6. PubMed ID: 26482816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. THE CONSISTENCY OF EXPOSURE INDICATOR VALUES IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
Jamil A; Mohd MI; Zain NM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(4):413-418. PubMed ID: 29767799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Body build and radiation exposure in static roentgen studies (I): A contribution for determining a national reference dose value. Promoted by the Federal Office for Radiation Protection (St.Sch 4163)].
Golder W; Weiner G
Rofo; 2001 Jun; 173(6):563-8. PubMed ID: 11471299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
