These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16916804)

  • 61. [A study of optimum radiographic conditions on chest examinations with computed radiology (CR) in conjunction with the offset balance of patient dose and image quality].
    Muto H; Mori T; Hayakawa H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 May; 61(6):303-9. PubMed ID: 11431936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Radiation exposure and image quality in chest CT examinations.
    Ravenel JG; Scalzetti EM; Huda W; Garrisi W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Aug; 177(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 11461845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. How does a non-optimal tube potential influence radiation dose to the patient in lumbar spine radiography?
    Alukic E; Mekis N
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 Nov; 27(4):1105-1109. PubMed ID: 34011453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation.
    Mulkens TH; Bellinck P; Baeyaert M; Ghysen D; Van Dijck X; Mussen E; Venstermans C; Termote JL
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):213-23. PubMed ID: 16126917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [Quality control--patient doses--guidance dose levels from diagnostic radiology in Tunisia].
    Ben Omrane L; Chahed N; Hammou A; Mtimet S
    Tunis Med; 2007 Jun; 85(6):465-8. PubMed ID: 17644898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. [Determination of the effective dose for CT examinations and influence of the setup parameters].
    Koller F; Roth J
    Rofo; 2007 Jan; 179(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 17203442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Retrospective analysis of computed radiography exposure reporting.
    David G; Redden AE
    Radiol Technol; 2011; 83(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 21908778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Survey of patient doses from conventional diagnostic radiographic examinations in Syria.
    Kharita MH; Khedr MS; Wannus KM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jul; 140(2):163-5. PubMed ID: 20332131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Organ dose evaluation for multi-slice spiral CT scans based on China Sichuan chest anthropomorphic phantom measurements.
    Peng G; Zeng Y; Luo T; Zhao F; Peng S; You R; Tan H; Liu X; Wang J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jul; 150(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 22039271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Monte Carlo study of grid performance in diagnostic radiology: factors which affect the selection of tube potential and grid ratio.
    Sandborg M; Dance DR; Carlsson GA; Persliden J
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Dec; 66(792):1164-76. PubMed ID: 8293262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Bone marrow dose in chest radiography: the posteroanterior vs. anteroposterior projection.
    Archer BR; Whitmore RC; North LB; Bushong SC
    Radiology; 1979 Oct; 133(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 472293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Effects of AEC chamber selection on patient dose and image quality.
    Hawking N; Elmore A
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(5):411-9. PubMed ID: 19457845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Radiation dose to patients from X-ray radiographic examinations using computed radiography imaging system.
    Sharma R; Sharma SD; Pawar S; Chaubey A; Kantharia S; Babu DA
    J Med Phys; 2015; 40(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 26150685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. LUMBAR SPINE RADIOGRAPHY: LOWER ORGAN DOSE WITH THE USE OF PA PROJECTION.
    Alukić E; Mekiš N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 186(4):507-512. PubMed ID: 31034550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Effect of a full and empty bladder on radiation dose to the uterus, ovaries and bladder from lumbar spine CT and X-ray examinations.
    Nicholson R; Coucher J; Thornton A; Connor F
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Dec; 73(876):1290-6. PubMed ID: 11205673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Evaluation of exposure parameters in plain radiography: a comparative study with European guidelines.
    Lança L; Silva A; Alves E; Serranheira F; Correia M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):316-20. PubMed ID: 18430717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Dose Optimization in Lumbar Spine Radiographic Examination by Air Gap Method at CR and DR Systems: A Phantom Study.
    Chan CTP; Fung KKL
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2015 Mar; 46(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 31052066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Local diagnostic reference levels in standard X-ray examinations.
    Compagnone G; Pagan L; Bergamini C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 15572400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Beam quality independent attenuation phantom for estimating patient exposure from x-ray automatic exposure controlled chest examinations.
    Conway BJ; Butler PF; Duff JE; Fewell TR; Gross RE; Jennings RJ; Koustenis GH; McCrohan JL; Rueter FG; Showalter CK
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(6):827-32. PubMed ID: 6513889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. X-ray examination dose surveys: how accurate are my results?
    Taylor S; Van Muylem A; Howarth N; Gevenois PA; Tack D
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5307-5313. PubMed ID: 30877467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.