1168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16918235)
1. Future of toxicology--low-dose toxicology and risk--benefit analysis.
Rietjens IM; Alink GM
Chem Res Toxicol; 2006 Aug; 19(8):977-81. PubMed ID: 16918235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hormesis [biological effects of low-level exposure (B.E.L.L.E.)] and dermatology.
Thong HY; Maibach HI
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(4):329-41. PubMed ID: 18058307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Evolution of industrial toxicology toward vanishing doses and the human genome].
Colombi A; Buratti M; Rubino FM; Giampiccolo R; Pulvirenti S; Brambilla G
Med Lav; 2003; 94(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 12768958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Health risk of low-dose pesticides mixtures: a review of the 1985-1998 literature on combination toxicology and health risk assessment.
Carpy SA; Kobel W; Doe J
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2000; 3(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 10711323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low-level chemical sensitivity: a perspective from behavioral toxicology.
Weiss B
Toxicol Ind Health; 1994; 10(4-5):605-17. PubMed ID: 7778118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomarkers in toxicology and risk assessment: informing critical dose-response relationships.
Swenberg JA; Fryar-Tita E; Jeong YC; Boysen G; Starr T; Walker VE; Albertini RJ
Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Jan; 21(1):253-65. PubMed ID: 18161944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Paradigm lost, paradigm found: the re-emergence of hormesis as a fundamental dose response model in the toxicological sciences.
Calabrese EJ
Environ Pollut; 2005 Dec; 138(3):379-411. PubMed ID: 16098930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dose response considerations in risk assessment--an overview of recent ILSI activities.
Holsapple MP; Wallace KB
Toxicol Lett; 2008 Aug; 180(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 18588961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utilization of juvenile animal studies to determine the human effects and risks of environmental toxicants during postnatal developmental stages.
Brent RL
Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol; 2004 Oct; 71(5):303-20. PubMed ID: 15505806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the risks of exposures to multiple chemicals with a common mechanism of toxicity: how to cumulate?
Wilkinson CF; Christoph GR; Julien E; Kelley JM; Kronenberg J; McCarthy J; Reiss R
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2000 Feb; 31(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 10715222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Integrated approaches for the analysis of toxicologic interactions of chemical mixtures.
el-Masri HA; Reardon KF; Yang RS
Crit Rev Toxicol; 1997 Mar; 27(2):175-97. PubMed ID: 9099518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of genetic toxicology information for risk assessment.
Dearfield KL; Moore MM
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2005 Dec; 46(4):236-45. PubMed ID: 16258925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dose-response assessment strategies for endocrine-active compounds.
Barton HA; Andersen ME
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Jun; 25(3):292-305. PubMed ID: 9237331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Principles of risk assessment for determining the safety of chemicals: recent assessment of residual solvents in drugs and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.
Hasegawa R; Koizumi M; Hirose A
Congenit Anom (Kyoto); 2004 Jun; 44(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 15198717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exposure to multiple environmental agents and their effect.
Koppe JG; Bartonova A; Bolte G; Bistrup ML; Busby C; Butter M; Dorfman P; Fucic A; Gee D; van den Hazel P; Howard V; Kohlhuber M; Leijs M; Lundqvist C; Moshammer H; Naginiene R; Nicolopoulou-Stamati P; Ronchetti R; Salines G; Schoeters G; ten Tusscher G; Wallis MK; Zuurbier M
Acta Paediatr Suppl; 2006 Oct; 95(453):106-13. PubMed ID: 17000577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benefits of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and maximum tolerated concentration (MTC) concept in aquatic toxicology.
Hutchinson TH; Bögi C; Winter MJ; Owens JW
Aquat Toxicol; 2009 Feb; 91(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 19124163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Specificity and dosimetry of toxicologic responses.
Doull J
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1996 Aug; 24(1 Pt 2):S55-7. PubMed ID: 8921557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The importance of non-linear (dose-dependent) pharmacokinetics in hazard assessment.
Watanabe PG; Young JD; Gehring PJ
J Environ Pathol Toxicol; 1977; 1(2):147-59. PubMed ID: 553128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigation of the potential impact of benchmark dose and pharmacokinetic modeling in noncancer risk assessment.
Clewell HJ; Gentry PR; Gearhart JM
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1997 Dec; 52(6):475-515. PubMed ID: 9397182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
