BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16918927)

  • 21. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
    Obuchowski NA
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Transformation-invariant and nonparametric monotone smooth estimation of ROC curves.
    Du P; Tang L
    Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(2):349-59. PubMed ID: 18985706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data.
    Walter SD
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1237-56. PubMed ID: 12111876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Best combination of multiple diagnostic tests for screening purposes.
    Qin J; Zhang B
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(28):2905-19. PubMed ID: 20862668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Measures of accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests.
    Drobatz KJ
    J Vet Cardiol; 2009 May; 11 Suppl 1():S33-40. PubMed ID: 19451045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
    Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of correlated ROC areas in diagnostic testing.
    Song HH
    Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):370-82. PubMed ID: 9147602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Semiparametric ROC surfaces for continuous diagnostic tests based on two test measurements.
    Wan S; Zhang B
    Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2370-83. PubMed ID: 19499550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantitative assessment of tumour extraction from dermoscopy images and evaluation of computer-based extraction methods for an automatic melanoma diagnostic system.
    Iyatomi H; Oka H; Saito M; Miyake A; Kimoto M; Yamagami J; Kobayashi S; Tanikawa A; Hagiwara M; Ogawa K; Argenziano G; Soyer HP; Tanaka M
    Melanoma Res; 2006 Apr; 16(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 16567974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A permutation test sensitive to differences in areas for comparing ROC curves from a paired design.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2873-93. PubMed ID: 16134144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of diagnostic markers by goodness-of-fit tests.
    Nakas C; Yiannoutsos CT; Bosch RJ; Moyssiadis C
    Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(15):2503-13. PubMed ID: 12872305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting.
    Vestergaard ME; Macaskill P; Holt PE; Menzies SW
    Br J Dermatol; 2008 Sep; 159(3):669-76. PubMed ID: 18616769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Semi-parametric estimation of the binormal ROC curve for a continuous diagnostic test.
    Cai T; Moskowitz CS
    Biostatistics; 2004 Oct; 5(4):573-86. PubMed ID: 15475420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. ROC graphs for assessing the ability of a diagnostic marker to detect three disease classes with an umbrella ordering.
    Nakas CT; Alonzo TA
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):603-9. PubMed ID: 17688513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A marginal model approach for analysis of multi-reader multi-test receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.
    Song X; Zhou XH
    Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):303-12. PubMed ID: 15772108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A model free approach to combining biomarkers.
    Pfeiffer RM; Bur E
    Biom J; 2008 Aug; 50(4):558-70. PubMed ID: 18663762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A program for computing the prediction probability and the related receiver operating characteristic graph.
    Jordan D; Steiner M; Kochs EF; Schneider G
    Anesth Analg; 2010 Dec; 111(6):1416-21. PubMed ID: 21059744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using confidence intervals to compare several correlated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Zou GY; Yue L
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(29):5077-90. PubMed ID: 23824874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Diagnostic accuracy].
    Simundić AM
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():93-111. PubMed ID: 16526310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Nonparametric statistical inference method for partial areas under receiver operating characteristic curves, with application to genomic studies.
    He Y; Escobar M
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(25):5291-308. PubMed ID: 18646265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.