88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16918968)
21. [An opinion survey about medical autopsy, Saint-Étienne University Hospital: are the French laws of bioethics to be revised?].
Duband S; Méon AS; Forest F; Prades JM; Cathébras P; Phelip JM; Péoc'h M
Rev Med Interne; 2011 Apr; 32(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 20970224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Human Tissue Bill: good for consent but is it good for patients?
Barth JH
Ann Clin Biochem; 2004 Jul; 41(Pt 4):257. PubMed ID: 15298735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Property: the future of human tissue?
Quigley M
Med Law Rev; 2009; 17(3):457-66. PubMed ID: 19850671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Retained organs.
Retained Organs Commission
Bull Med Ethics; 2002 Mar; (176):8-11. PubMed ID: 12408122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Coroner's recommendation: confidentiality.
Nurs BC; 2007 Feb; 39(1):18. PubMed ID: 17380859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Tissue banking in a regulated environment--does this help the patient? Part 2--Patient views and expectations (including the EUROPA DONNA Forum UK position).
Borisch B
Pathobiology; 2007; 74(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 17709964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Legal implications of tissue.
Lucassen A; Wheeler R
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2010 Apr; 92(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 20412669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Over my dead body: coroner's case.
Patel F
Br J Hosp Med; 1991 Jul; 46(1):11. PubMed ID: 1868298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Privacy and the secondary use of data in health research in Scotland.
Fraser A
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2003 Jul; 8 Suppl 1():S1:12-6. PubMed ID: 12869332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Should presumed consent on medical autopsies be questioned?].
Manaouil C; Chatelain D; Jardé O
Rev Med Interne; 2011 Apr; 32(4):201-4. PubMed ID: 21122954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Consent for autopsies.
Schmidt S
JAMA; 1983 Sep; 250(9):1161-4. PubMed ID: 6876352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Autopsy].
Hauw JJ
Rev Neurol (Paris); 2001 Jul; 157(6-7):611-7. PubMed ID: 11458180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Regional neuropathology referral practice before and after new organ retention legislation.
McEwan K; McAdam J; Stewart W
Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Sep; 211(1-3):e9-11. PubMed ID: 21664774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Beyond organ retention: the new human tissue bill.
Ellis I
Lancet; 2004 Dec; 364 Suppl 1():s42-3. PubMed ID: 15967149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Coroner's Rule 9 is necessary for health protection: implications of possible legislative changes concerning the use of human organs and tissues.
Jones J
Commun Dis Public Health; 2002 Sep; 5(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 12434698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Consent for organ transplantation and autopsies.
Brouwer IG
SADJ; 2004 Nov; 59(10):426-7. PubMed ID: 15726762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Autopsy--legal basis (Part II)].
Berent J; Barzdo M
Przegl Lek; 2009; 66(5):269-71. PubMed ID: 19739587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Regulations for autopsy and organ removal in Sweden].
Rammer L
Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1990; 48():103-5. PubMed ID: 2241773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Coronial autopsy in a rural setting.
Zardawi IM
J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Oct; 20(7):848-51. PubMed ID: 24112334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Legal aspects of consent 14: organ removal, retention, storage.
Dimond B
Br J Nurs; 2001 Oct 11-24; 10(18):1212-4. PubMed ID: 11893961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
