193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16918992)
1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening modalities for breast cancer in Japan with special reference to women aged 40-49 years.
Ohnuki K; Kuriyama S; Shoji N; Nishino Y; Tsuji I; Ohuchi N
Cancer Sci; 2006 Nov; 97(11):1242-7. PubMed ID: 16918992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The cost-effectiveness of mammographic screening strategies.
Lindfors KK; Rosenquist CJ
JAMA; 1995 Sep; 274(11):881-4. PubMed ID: 7674501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Cost-effectiveness of multiple screening modalities on breast cancer in Chinese women from Shanghai].
Wu F; Mo M; Qin XX; Fang H; Zhao GM; Liu GY; Chen YY; Cao ZG; Yan YJ; Lyu LL; Xu WH; Shao ZM
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 38(12):1665-1671. PubMed ID: 29294584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A model-based comparison of breast cancer screening strategies: mammograms and clinical breast examinations.
Shen Y; Parmigiani G
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Feb; 14(2):529-32. PubMed ID: 15734983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incorporating Baseline Breast Density When Screening Women at Average Risk for Breast Cancer : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Shih YT; Dong W; Xu Y; Etzioni R; Shen Y
Ann Intern Med; 2021 May; 174(5):602-612. PubMed ID: 33556275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of extending screening mammography guidelines to include women 40 to 49 years of age.
Salzmann P; Kerlikowske K; Phillips K
Ann Intern Med; 1997 Dec; 127(11):955-65. PubMed ID: 9412300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Updated Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines for Average-Risk Women.
Tina Shih YC; Dong W; Xu Y; Shen Y
Value Health; 2019 Feb; 22(2):185-193. PubMed ID: 30711063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost effectiveness of mammography screening for Chinese women.
Wong IO; Kuntz KM; Cowling BJ; Lam CL; Leung GM
Cancer; 2007 Aug; 110(4):885-95. PubMed ID: 17607668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in women on dialysis.
Wong G; Howard K; Chapman JR; Craig JC
Am J Kidney Dis; 2008 Nov; 52(5):916-29. PubMed ID: 18789566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benefits and costs of screening and treatment for early breast cancer. Development of a basic benefit package.
Kattlove H; Liberati A; Keeler E; Brook RH
JAMA; 1995 Jan; 273(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 7799495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benefits, harms, and costs for breast cancer screening after US implementation of digital mammography.
Stout NK; Lee SJ; Schechter CB; Kerlikowske K; Alagoz O; Berry D; Buist DS; Cevik M; Chisholm G; de Koning HJ; Huang H; Hubbard RA; Miglioretti DL; Munsell MF; Trentham-Dietz A; van Ravesteyn NT; Tosteson AN; Mandelblatt JS
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Jun; 106(6):dju092. PubMed ID: 24872543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The cost-effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis in a population breast cancer screening program.
Wang J; Phi XA; Greuter MJW; Daszczuk AM; Feenstra TL; Pijnappel RM; Vermeulen KM; Buls N; Houssami N; Lu W; de Bock GH
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5437-5445. PubMed ID: 32382844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of breast MR imaging and screen-film mammography for screening BRCA1 gene mutation carriers.
Lee JM; McMahon PM; Kong CY; Kopans DB; Ryan PD; Ozanne EM; Halpern EF; Gazelle GS
Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 20177093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of annual versus biennial screening mammography for women with high mammographic breast density.
Pataky R; Ismail Z; Coldman AJ; Elwood M; Gelmon K; Hedden L; Hislop G; Kan L; McCoy B; Olivotto IA; Peacock S
J Med Screen; 2014 Dec; 21(4):180-8. PubMed ID: 25186116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effective mammography screening in Korea: high incidence of breast cancer in young women.
Lee SY; Jeong SH; Kim YN; Kim J; Kang DR; Kim HC; Nam CM
Cancer Sci; 2009 Jun; 100(6):1105-11. PubMed ID: 19320639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness analysis for breast cancer screening: double reading versus single + CAD reading.
Sato M; Kawai M; Nishino Y; Shibuya D; Ohuchi N; Ishibashi T
Breast Cancer; 2014 Sep; 21(5):532-41. PubMed ID: 23104393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness analysis of mammography and clinical breast examination strategies: a comparison with current guidelines.
Ahern CH; Shen Y
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Mar; 18(3):718-25. PubMed ID: 19258473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.
Schousboe JT; Kerlikowske K; Loh A; Cummings SR
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21727289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening mammography in women aged 40-49 years: analysis of cost-effectiveness.
Rosenquist CJ; Lindfors KK
Radiology; 1994 Jun; 191(3):647-50. PubMed ID: 8184041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
