BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16919257)

  • 1. Image-type dependent eigen-regions-of-interest define conspicuity operators for predicting human scanpath fixation.
    Fujita T; Privitera CM; Stark LW
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Jul; 37(7):965-74. PubMed ID: 16919257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the discriminability of hROIs, human visually selected regions-of-interest.
    Privitera CM; Fujita T; Chernyak D; Stark LW
    Biol Cybern; 2005 Aug; 93(2):141-52. PubMed ID: 16041546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Components of bottom-up gaze allocation in natural images.
    Peters RJ; Iyer A; Itti L; Koch C
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(18):2397-416. PubMed ID: 15935435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An information maximization model of eye movements.
    Renninger LW; Coughlan J; Verghese P; Malik J
    Adv Neural Inf Process Syst; 2005; 17():1121-8. PubMed ID: 16175670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition.
    Foulsham T; Underwood G
    J Vis; 2008 Feb; 8(2):6.1-17. PubMed ID: 18318632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fixation-dependent memory for natural scenes: an experimental test of scanpath theory.
    Foulsham T; Kingstone A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Feb; 142(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 22506754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual attention on the sphere.
    Bogdanova I; Bur A; Hugli H
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2008 Nov; 17(11):2000-14. PubMed ID: 18854253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance.
    Chen X; Zelinsky GJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(24):4118-33. PubMed ID: 17005231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Natural scene statistics at the centre of gaze.
    Reinagel P; Zador AM
    Network; 1999 Nov; 10(4):341-50. PubMed ID: 10695763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Domain knowledge moderates the influence of visual saliency in scene recognition.
    Humphrey K; Underwood G
    Br J Psychol; 2009 May; 100(Pt 2):377-98. PubMed ID: 18822185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Through a barn owl's eyes: interactions between scene content and visual attention.
    Ohayon S; Harmening W; Wagner H; Rivlin E
    Biol Cybern; 2008 Feb; 98(2):115-32. PubMed ID: 18066583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Real and predicted influence of image manipulations on eye movements during scene recognition.
    Harding G; Bloj M
    J Vis; 2010 Feb; 10(2):8.1-17. PubMed ID: 20462309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ongoing eye movements constrain visual perception.
    Hafed ZM; Krauzlis RJ
    Nat Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 9(11):1449-57. PubMed ID: 17028586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. String editing analysis of human visual search.
    Choi YS; Mosley AD; Stark LW
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Jul; 72(7):439-51. PubMed ID: 8539007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of scanpath comparison methods.
    Anderson NC; Anderson F; Kingstone A; Bischof WF
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1377-1392. PubMed ID: 25540126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences of monkey and human overt attention under natural conditions.
    Einhäuser W; Kruse W; Hoffmann KP; König P
    Vision Res; 2006 Apr; 46(8-9):1194-209. PubMed ID: 16375943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Foveated analysis of image features at fixations.
    Rajashekar U; van der Linde I; Bovik AC; Cormack LK
    Vision Res; 2007 Nov; 47(25):3160-72. PubMed ID: 17889221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of luminance contrast and its modifications on fixation behavior during free viewing of images from different categories.
    Açik A; Onat S; Schumann F; Einhäuser W; König P
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(12):1541-53. PubMed ID: 19306892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Humans have idiosyncratic and task-specific scanpaths for judging faces.
    Kanan C; Bseiso DN; Ray NA; Hsiao JH; Cottrell GW
    Vision Res; 2015 Mar; 108():67-76. PubMed ID: 25641371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Foveal versus parafoveal scanpaths of visual imagery in virtual hemianopic subjects.
    Zangemeister WH; Liman T
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Jul; 37(7):975-82. PubMed ID: 17376424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.