224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16920177)
21. The roles of distractor noise and target certainty in search: a signal detection model.
Santhi N; Reeves A
Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1235-56. PubMed ID: 15066389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Serial correlations and 1/f power spectra in visual search reaction times.
McIlhagga W
J Vis; 2008 Jul; 8(9):5.1-14. PubMed ID: 18831641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The impact of item clustering on visual search: It all depends on the nature of the visual search.
Xu Y
J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):. PubMed ID: 21177422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Serial and parallel attentive visual searches: evidence from cumulative distribution functions of response times.
Sung K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1372-88. PubMed ID: 19045981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Attentional effects on sensory tuning for single-feature detection and double-feature conjunction.
Neri P
Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(26):3053-64. PubMed ID: 15474578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Early visual tagging: effects of target-distractor similarity and old age on search, subitization, and counting.
Watson DG; Maylor EA; Allen GE; Bruce LA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Jun; 33(3):549-69. PubMed ID: 17563221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects.
Hommuk K; Bachmann T
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Attentional requirements in a 'preattentive' feature search task.
Joseph JS; Chun MM; Nakayama K
Nature; 1997 Jun; 387(6635):805-7. PubMed ID: 9194560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Determining subprocesses of visual feature search with reaction time models.
Müller-Plath G; Pollmann S
Psychol Res; 2003 May; 67(2):80-105. PubMed ID: 12739145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bottom-up guidance in visual search for conjunctions.
Proulx MJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 17311478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Early and late modulation of saccade deviations by target distractor similarity.
Mulckhuyse M; Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J
J Neurophysiol; 2009 Sep; 102(3):1451-8. PubMed ID: 19553494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of target foreknowledge on visual search for categorically separable orientation targets.
Hodsoll JP; Humphreys GW
Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(18):2346-51. PubMed ID: 15913702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Repetition of distractor sets improves visual search performance in hemispatial neglect.
Saevarsson S; Jóelsdóttir S; Hjaltason H; Kristjánsson A
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Mar; 46(4):1161-9. PubMed ID: 18068736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A conjunctive feature similarity effect for visual search.
Takeda Y; Phillips S; Kumada T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Feb; 60(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 17455054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Greater frontal-parietal synchrony at low gamma-band frequencies for inefficient than efficient visual search in human EEG.
Phillips S; Takeda Y
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):350-4. PubMed ID: 19481120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Attentional capture by a salient distractor in visual search: the effect of target-distractor similarity.
Poiese P; Spalek TM; Di Lollo V
Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Dec; 62(4):233-6. PubMed ID: 19071990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Search time critically depends on irrelevant subset size in visual search.
Benjamins JS; Hooge IT; van Elst JC; Wertheim AH; Verstraten FA
Vision Res; 2009 Feb; 49(3):398-406. PubMed ID: 19068222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Automatic computation of an image's statistical surprise predicts performance of human observers on a natural image detection task.
Mundhenk TN; Einhäuser W; Itti L
Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(13):1620-37. PubMed ID: 19351543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. When does visual attention select all features of a distractor?
Chen Z; Cave KR
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1452-64. PubMed ID: 17154784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Hiding and finding: the relationship between visual concealment and visual search.
Smilek D; Weinheimer L; Kwan D; Reynolds M; Kingstone A
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1793-806. PubMed ID: 19933563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
