These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16920186)

  • 1. Comparison of FACSCount AF system, Improved Neubauer hemocytometer, Corning 254 photometer, SpermVision, UltiMate and NucleoCounter SP-100 for determination of sperm concentration of boar semen.
    Hansen C; Vermeiden T; Vermeiden JP; Simmet C; Day BC; Feitsma H
    Theriogenology; 2006 Dec; 66(9):2188-94. PubMed ID: 16920186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality control in boar semen production by use of the FACSCount AF system.
    Christensen P; Knudsen DB; Wachmann H; Madsen MT
    Theriogenology; 2004 Oct; 62(7):1218-28. PubMed ID: 15325548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is photometry an accurate and reliable method to assess boar semen concentration?
    Camus A; Camugli S; Lévêque C; Schmitt E; Staub C
    Theriogenology; 2011 Feb; 75(3):577-83. PubMed ID: 21074835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of different methods for assessment of sperm concentration and membrane integrity with bull semen.
    Anzar M; Kroetsch T; Buhr MM
    J Androl; 2009; 30(6):661-8. PubMed ID: 19478330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of the FACSCount AF system for determination of sperm concentration in boar semen.
    Hansen C; Christensen P; Stryhn H; Hedeboe AM; Rode M; Boe-Hansen G
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2002 Dec; 37(6):330-4. PubMed ID: 12464070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Capillary-loaded particle fluid dynamics: effect on estimation of sperm concentration.
    Douglas-Hamilton DH; Smith NG; Kuster CE; Vermeiden JP; Althouse GC
    J Androl; 2005; 26(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 15611575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of Makler counting chamber and improved Neubauer hemocytometer in sperm concentration measurement.
    Sukcharoen N; Ngeamjirawat J; Chanprasit Y; Aribarg A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1994 Sep; 77(9):471-6. PubMed ID: 7706966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is flow cytometry really adapted to the determination of sperm concentration?
    Lu JC; Chen F; Xu HR; Wu YM; Xia XY; Huang YF; Lu NQ
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2007; 67(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 17558894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementation of flow cytometry for quality control in four Danish bull studs.
    Christensen P; Hansen C; Liboriussen T; Lehn-Jensen H
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2005 Feb; 85(3-4):201-8. PubMed ID: 15581504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the Karras spermdensimeter in relation to the Neubauer counting chamber for sperm concentration measurement in boar semen.
    Vianna WL; Bruno DG; Namindome A; de Campos Rosseto AC; Barnabé RC; de Sant' Anna Moretti A
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2007 Oct; 42(5):466-70. PubMed ID: 17845601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of the sperm quality analyzer (SQA-Vp) for porcine semen analysis.
    Rodríguez AL; Rijsselaere T; Bijttebier J; Vyt P; Van Soom A; Maes D
    Theriogenology; 2011 Mar; 75(5):972-7. PubMed ID: 21144570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The comparison of assessment of pigeon semen motility and sperm concentration by conventional methods and the CASA system (HTM IVOS).
    Klimowicz MD; Nizanski W; Batkowski F; Savic MA
    Theriogenology; 2008 Jul; 70(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 18423566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Andrology laboratory review: Evaluation of sperm concentration.
    Brito LFC; Althouse GC; Aurich C; Chenoweth PJ; Eilts BE; Love CC; Luvoni GC; Mitchell JR; Peter AT; Pugh DG; Waberski D
    Theriogenology; 2016 Jun; 85(9):1507-1527. PubMed ID: 27045626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Primary investigations on the quality control for semen analysis in Nanjing City].
    Lu JC; Xu HR; Chen F; Huang YF
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2007 Jan; 13(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 17302033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multicenter study evaluating the flowcytometric-based kit for semen analysis.
    Shai S; Roudebush W; Powers D; Dirnfeld M; Lamb DJ
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Apr; 83(4):1034-8. PubMed ID: 15820817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of NUCLEOCOUNTER, ANDROVISION with Leja chambers and the newly developed ANDROVISION eFlow for sperm concentration analysis in boars.
    Grossfeld R; Pable J; Jakop U; Simmet C; Schulze M
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11943. PubMed ID: 35831488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation and application of an assay for deoxyribonucleic acid to estimate concentrations of bull sperm.
    Fenton SE; Ax RL; Cowan CM; Coyle T; Gilbert GR; Lenz RW
    J Dairy Sci; 1990 Nov; 73(11):3118-25. PubMed ID: 2273141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the sperm mobility assay in boars and stallions.
    Vizcarra JA; Ford JJ
    Theriogenology; 2006 Sep; 66(5):1091-7. PubMed ID: 16644000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of counting chamber type on CASA outcomes of equine semen analysis.
    Hoogewijs MK; de Vliegher SP; Govaere JL; de Schauwer C; de Kruif A; van Soom A
    Equine Vet J; 2012 Sep; 44(5):542-9. PubMed ID: 22150933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of selected quality parameters of epididymal cat (Felis catus s. domestica, L. 1758) sperm using flow cytometry method and computer assisted sperm analyser.
    Siemieniuch MJ; Woclawek-Potocka I
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2008 Oct; 43(5):633-7. PubMed ID: 18363605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.