285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16920508)
1. Meeting maternal request for caesarean section - paving the road to hell?
McCandlish R
Midwifery; 2006 Sep; 22(3):204-6. PubMed ID: 16920508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Marion's message. Cesarean on maternal request.
McLean MT
Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2006; (80):10, 66. PubMed ID: 17265822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Trends versus tradition in cesarean surgery: effects on midwifery practice and cesarean mothers' future pregnancies.
Gaskin IM
Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2007; (82):32-4. PubMed ID: 17725126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: implications for anesthesia providers.
Chestnut DH
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2006 Oct; 15(4):269-72. PubMed ID: 16949271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Marion's message: too many or not enough cesarean sections?
McLean MT
Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2007; (82):9. PubMed ID: 17725115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Trends and patterns in cesarean section rates in Rhode Island.
Viner-Brown SI; Cain R
Med Health R I; 2006 Jun; 89(6):215-6. PubMed ID: 16875011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Choice in cesarean.
Davies L
Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2008; (86):22-5. PubMed ID: 18630009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The assault on normal birth: the OB disinformation campaign.
Goer H
Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2002; (63):10-4. PubMed ID: 12298378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Caesareans and low-risk women in Israel.
Cohain JS; Yoselis A
Pract Midwife; 2004; 7(7):28-31. PubMed ID: 15323336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Should maternal choice be an indication for caesarean section?
Duckworth S
Int J Surg; 2008 Aug; 6(4):277-80. PubMed ID: 18178139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Taking normal birth forward.
Downe S
Pract Midwife; 2009 Jun; 12(6):16-8. PubMed ID: 19624058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Risks and benefits of caesarean delivery on maternal request.
Midwifery; 2006 Jun; 22(2):98-9. PubMed ID: 16832891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. "Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request": was the NIH conference based on a faulty premise?
Young D
Birth; 2006 Sep; 33(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 16948716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Caesarean section: The ultimate by-product of the One Two Punch Theory.
Fenwick J
Women Birth; 2009 Dec; 22(4):107-8. PubMed ID: 19734115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Who are the statistics?
Tritten J
Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2007; (83):5. PubMed ID: 17927105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. NIH consensus development statement on cesarean childbirth. The Cesarean Birth Task Force.
Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Apr; 57(4):537-45. PubMed ID: 7243111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Can a 29% cesarean delivery rate possibly be justified?
Agnew G; Turner M
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 108(2):452; author reply 452. PubMed ID: 16880319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence-based strategies for reducing cesarean section rates: a meta-analysis.
Chaillet N; Dumont A
Birth; 2007 Mar; 34(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 17324180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. NIH State of the Science Conference: cesarean delivery on maternal request.
Adv Neonatal Care; 2006 Aug; 6(4):171-2. PubMed ID: 16929567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. High caesarean section rates among women over 30. High rates may be due to perceived potential for complications.
Weaver J; Statham H; Richards M
BMJ; 2001 Aug; 323(7307):284-5. PubMed ID: 11505941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
