These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1692124)
1. Utility of low energy test shocks for estimation of cardiac and electrode impedance with implantable defibrillators. Leitch JW; Yee R; Klein GJ; Jones DL Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Apr; 13(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 1692124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Successful atrial defibrillation with very-low-energy shocks by means of temporary epicardial wire electrodes. Cmolik BL; Oritz J; Ayers GM; Lee JH; Geha AS; Waldo AL J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Feb; 111(2):392-7; discussion 397-8. PubMed ID: 8583812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of shock timing on defibrillation success. Hsu W; Lin Y; Heil JE; Jones J; Lang DJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1 Pt 2):153-7. PubMed ID: 9121980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Energy, current, and success in defibrillation and cardioversion: clinical studies using an automated impedance-based method of energy adjustment. Kerber RE; Martins JB; Kienzle MG; Constantin L; Olshansky B; Hopson R; Charbonnier F Circulation; 1988 May; 77(5):1038-46. PubMed ID: 3359585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of delivered energy on defibrillation shock impedance. Weiss DN; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1998 Sep; 2(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 9870022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determinants of successful transthoracic defibrillation and outcome in ventricular fibrillation. Dalzell GW; Adgey AA Br Heart J; 1991 Jun; 65(6):311-6. PubMed ID: 2054239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial clinical experience with endocardial defibrillation using an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator with a triple-electrode system. Saksena S; Tullo NG; Krol RB; Mauro AM Arch Intern Med; 1989 Oct; 149(10):2333-9. PubMed ID: 2802898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical shock tolerability and effect of different right atrial electrode locations on efficacy of low energy human transvenous atrial defibrillation using an implantable lead system. Lok NS; Lau CP; Tse HF; Ayers GM J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 30(5):1324-30. PubMed ID: 9350935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ventricular proarrhythmic effects of ventricular cycle length and shock strength in a sheep model of transvenous atrial defibrillation. Ayers GM; Alferness CA; Ilina M; Wagner DO; Sirokman WA; Adams JM; Griffin JC Circulation; 1994 Jan; 89(1):413-22. PubMed ID: 8281677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pediatric defibrillation: current flow is improved by using "adult" electrode paddles. Atkins DL; Kerber RE Pediatrics; 1994 Jul; 94(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 8008545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low voltage shocks have a significantly higher tilt of the internal electric field than do high voltage shocks. Brewer JE; Tvedt MA; Adams TP; Kroll MW Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jan; 18(1 Pt 2):214. PubMed ID: 7724402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical efficacy of dual electrode systems for endocardial cardioversion of ventricular tachycardia: a prospective randomized crossover trial. Saksena S; An H Am Heart J; 1990 Jan; 119(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2404386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bidirectional transvenous/subcutaneous defibrillation of ventricular fibrillation in dogs: success rates, energy requirements, currents, voltages and impedance. Budde T; Vukmirovic NB; Soriano-Romero JM; Abu-Ghazaleh S; Borggrefe M; Schmiel FK; Pölitz B; Arnold G; Breithardt G Eur Heart J; 1988 Jan; 9(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 3345775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advance prediction of transthoracic impedance in human defibrillation and cardioversion: importance of impedance in determining the success of low-energy shocks. Kerber RE; Kouba C; Martins J; Kelly K; Low R; Hoyt R; Ferguson D; Bailey L; Bennett P; Charbonnier F Circulation; 1984 Aug; 70(2):303-8. PubMed ID: 6733884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Overlapping sequential pulses. A new waveform for transthoracic defibrillation. Kerber RE; Spencer KT; Kallok MJ; Birkett C; Smith R; Yoerger D; Kieso RA Circulation; 1994 May; 89(5):2369-79. PubMed ID: 8181163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Upper limit of vulnerability is a good estimator of shock strength associated with 90% probability of successful defibrillation in humans with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Swerdlow CD; Ahern T; Kass RM; Davie S; Mandel WJ; Chen PS J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 27(5):1112-8. PubMed ID: 8609329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrode polarity is an important determinant of defibrillation efficacy using a nonthoracotomy system. Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 May; 17(5 Pt 1):919-23. PubMed ID: 8022704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quadriphasic waveforms are superior to triphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in a cardiac arrest swine model with high impedance. Zhang Y; Rhee B; Davies LR; Zimmerman MB; Snyder D; Jones JL; Kerber RE Resuscitation; 2006 Feb; 68(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 16325983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endocardial pacing, cardioversion and defibrillation using a braided endocardial lead system. Saksena S; Luceri R; Krol RB; Brownstein S; Burkhardt E; Accorti P; Brewer G; Scott S; Callaghan F; Livingston A Am J Cardiol; 1993 Apr; 71(10):834-41. PubMed ID: 8456763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transmembrane voltage changes produced by real and virtual electrodes during monophasic defibrillation shock delivered by an implantable electrode. Efimov IR; Cheng YN; Biermann M; Van Wagoner DR; Mazgalev TN; Tchou PJ J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 8(9):1031-45. PubMed ID: 9300301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]