These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1692126)

  • 1. The defibrillation success rate versus energy relationship: Part II--Estimation with the "bootstrap".
    Gliner BE; Murakawa Y; Thakor NV
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Apr; 13(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 1692126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The defibrillation success rate versus energy relationship: Part I--Curve fitting and the most efficient defibrillation energy.
    Gliner BE; Murakawa Y; Thakor NV
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Mar; 13(3):326-38. PubMed ID: 1690405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relationship between successful defibrillation and delivered energy in open-chest dogs: reappraisal of the "defibrillation threshold" concept.
    Davy JM; Fain ES; Dorian P; Winkle RA
    Am Heart J; 1987 Jan; 113(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 3799444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transepicardial defibrillation dose response: current versus energy.
    Wesley RC; Farkhani F; Porzio D; Kouri J; Resh W; Zimmerman D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Jan; 16(1 Pt 2):193-7. PubMed ID: 7681570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A critical period of ventricular fibrillation more susceptible to defibrillation: real-time waveform analysis using a single ECG lead.
    Hsia PW; Frerk S; Allen CA; Wise RM; Cohen NM; Damiano RJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Apr; 19(4 Pt 1):418-30. PubMed ID: 8848389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genesis of sigmoidal dose-response curve during defibrillation by random shock: a theoretical model based on experimental evidence for a vulnerable window during ventricular fibrillation.
    Hsia PW; Mahmud R
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Oct; 13(10):1326-42. PubMed ID: 1701547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transmyocardial impedance during single and multiple internal ventricular defibrillation shocks.
    Peters W; Solingen S; Kobayashi Y; Scharf R; Mandel WJ; Gang ES
    Am J Physiol; 1994 Aug; 267(2 Pt 2):H684-93. PubMed ID: 8067424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of multiple shocks on canine cardiac defibrillation.
    Flaker G; Schuder J; McDaniel W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 1):1580-4. PubMed ID: 1704508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating the parameter distributions of defibrillation shock efficacy curves in a large population.
    Smits K; Virag N
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Apr; 38(4):1314-25. PubMed ID: 20069370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pericardial effusion increases defibrillation energy requirement.
    Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Troup PJ; Chapman PD; Wetherbee JN
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Jun; 16(6):1227-30. PubMed ID: 7686649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Success rate versus defibrillation energy: temporal profile and the most efficient defibrillation threshold.
    Murakawa Y; Gliner BE; Thakor NV
    Am Heart J; 1989 Sep; 118(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 2773769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of an unsuccessful subthreshold shock on the energy requirement for the subsequent defibrillation.
    Murakawa Y; Gliner BE; Shankar B; Thakor NV
    Am Heart J; 1989 May; 117(5):1065-9. PubMed ID: 2711966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Defibrillation threshold: a simple and quantitative estimate of the ability to defibrillate.
    Rattes MF; Jones DL; Sharma AD; Klein GJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Jan; 10(1 Pt 1):70-7. PubMed ID: 2436171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mexiletine has no effect on defibrillation energy requirements in dogs.
    Sato S; Tsuji MH; Naito H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Dec; 17(12 Pt 1):2279-84. PubMed ID: 7885935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Importance of electrode design, lead configuration and impedance for successful low energy transcatheter atrial defibrillation in dogs.
    Kalman JM; Power JM; Chen JM; Farish SJ; Tonkin AM
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Oct; 22(4):1199-206. PubMed ID: 8409061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nature of defibrillation: determinism versus probabilism.
    Deale OC; Wesley RC; Morgan D; Lerman BB
    Am J Physiol; 1990 Nov; 259(5 Pt 2):H1544-50. PubMed ID: 2240251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the efficacy of defibrillation with the damped sine and constant-tilt current waveforms in the intact animal.
    Hinds M; Ayers GM; Bourland JD; Geddes LA; Tacker WA; Fearnot N
    Med Instrum; 1987 Apr; 21(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 3614037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Probability of successful defibrillation at multiples of the defibrillation energy requirement in patients with an implantable defibrillator.
    Strickberger SA; Daoud EG; Davidson T; Weiss R; Bogun F; Knight BP; Bahu M; Goyal R; Man KC; Morady F
    Circulation; 1997 Aug; 96(4):1217-23. PubMed ID: 9286952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A model to evaluate alternative methods of defibrillation threshold determination.
    Church T; Martinson M; Kallok M; Watson W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):2002-7. PubMed ID: 2463579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of antiarrhythmic drugs on defibrillation energy requirements in dogs. Sodium channel block and action potential prolongation.
    Echt DS; Black JN; Barbey JT; Coxe DR; Cato E
    Circulation; 1989 May; 79(5):1106-17. PubMed ID: 2469545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.