These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1692126)

  • 21. Atrial defibrillation using temporary epicardial defibrillation stainless steel wire electrodes: studies in the canine sterile pericarditis model.
    Ortiz J; Sokoloski MC; Ayers GM; Cmolik BL; Niwano S; Geha AS; Waldo AL
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Nov; 26(5):1356-64. PubMed ID: 7594054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of biphasic and conventional monophasic defibrillation on postresuscitation myocardial function.
    Tang W; Weil MH; Sun S; Yamaguchi H; Povoas HP; Pernat AM; Bisera J
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Sep; 34(3):815-22. PubMed ID: 10483965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of flecainide on defibrillation thresholds in the anesthetized dog.
    Hernandez R; Mann DE; Breckinridge S; Williams GR; Reiter MJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Sep; 14(3):777-81. PubMed ID: 2504799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Immediate termination of fibrillation at 50% probability of overall success correlates with defibrillation dose-response curve width.
    Tovar OH; Snyder DE; Jones JL
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Oct; 15(10):1207-11. PubMed ID: 15485449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predict Defibrillation Outcome Using Stepping Increment of Poincare Plot for Out-of-Hospital Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiac Arrest.
    Gong Y; Lu Y; Zhang L; Zhang H; Li Y
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():493472. PubMed ID: 26413527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improved efficacy of anodal biphasic defibrillation shocks following a failed defibrillation attempt.
    Roberts PR; Allen S; Smith DC; Urban JF; Euler DE; Kallok MJ; Morgan JM
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Dec; 22(12):1753-9. PubMed ID: 10642128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effectiveness of direct current defibrillation: role of paddle electrode size.
    Thomas ED; Ewy GA; Dahl CF; Ewy MD
    Am Heart J; 1977 Apr; 93(4):463-7. PubMed ID: 842442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Hilbert transform analysis of the relation between ventricular fibrillation voltage and the outcome of defibrillation shocks].
    Wang K; Deng X; Guo R; Patwardhan A; Leonelli F
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Jun; 23(3):512-6. PubMed ID: 16856380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predicting the relative efficacy of shock waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in dogs.
    White JB; Walcott GP; Wayland JL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Ann Emerg Med; 1999 Sep; 34(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 10459086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ventricular defibrillation with myocardial electrodes in the dog, calf, pony, and pig.
    Gold JH; Schuder JC; Stoeckle H
    Med Instrum; 1980; 14(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7354731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The defibrillation threshold: a comparison of anesthetics and measurement methods.
    Gill RM; Sweeney RJ; Reid PR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Apr; 16(4 Pt 1):708-14. PubMed ID: 7683796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lidocaine causes a reversible, concentration-dependent increase in defibrillation energy requirements.
    Dorian P; Fain ES; Davy JM; Winkle RA
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1986 Aug; 8(2):327-32. PubMed ID: 3734254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Strength-duration and probability of success curves for defibrillation with biphasic waveforms.
    Feeser SA; Tang AS; Kavanagh KM; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Wolf PD; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1990 Dec; 82(6):2128-41. PubMed ID: 2242537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of ventricular fibrillation duration on defibrillation energy in dogs using bidirectional pulse discharges.
    Echt DS; Barbey JT; Black JN
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Sep; 11(9):1315-23. PubMed ID: 2460837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Electrode surface area is an important variable for defibrillation.
    Singer I; Goldsmith J; Maldonado C
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jan; 18(1 Pt 2):233-6. PubMed ID: 7724406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of shock timing on defibrillation success.
    Hsu W; Lin Y; Heil JE; Jones J; Lang DJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1 Pt 2):153-7. PubMed ID: 9121980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Barium decreases defibrillation energy requirements.
    Dorian P; Witkowski FX; Penkoske PA; Feder-Elituv RS
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1994 Jan; 23(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 7511721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Relationship of left ventricular mass to defibrillation threshold for the implantable defibrillator: a combined clinical and animal study.
    Chapman PD; Sagar KB; Wetherbee JN; Troup PJ
    Am Heart J; 1987 Aug; 114(2):274-8. PubMed ID: 3604882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Improved nonthoracotomy defibrillation based on ventricular fibrillation waveform characteristics.
    Hsia PW; Suresh G; Allen CA; Harrington G; Maskal S; Fain E; Damiano RJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 1):1537-47. PubMed ID: 8946448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of pH and hypoxia on the success of defibrillation.
    Yakaitis RW; Thomas JD; Mahaffey JE
    Crit Care Med; 1975; 3(4):139-42. PubMed ID: 210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.