These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16922061)

  • 1. Visual influences on perception of speech and nonspeech vocal-tract events.
    Brancazio L; Best CT; Fowler CA
    Lang Speech; 2006; 49(Pt 1):21-53. PubMed ID: 16922061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual influences on auditory pluck and bow judgments.
    Saldaña HM; Rosenblum LD
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Sep; 54(3):406-16. PubMed ID: 8414899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech.
    Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005229. PubMed ID: 28207734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audiovisual perception of congruent and incongruent Dutch front vowels.
    Valkenier B; Duyne JY; Andringa TC; Baskent D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1788-801. PubMed ID: 22992710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Similar frequency of the McGurk effect in large samples of native Mandarin Chinese and American English speakers.
    Magnotti JF; Basu Mallick D; Feng G; Zhou B; Zhou W; Beauchamp MS
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Sep; 233(9):2581-6. PubMed ID: 26041554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. McGurk effect in non-English listeners: few visual effects for Japanese subjects hearing Japanese syllables of high auditory intelligibility.
    Sekiyama K; Tohkura Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1797-805. PubMed ID: 1960275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech identification in noise: Contribution of temporal, spectral, and visual speech cues.
    Kim J; Davis C; Groot C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3246-57. PubMed ID: 20000938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audiovisual investigation of the loudness-effort effect for speech and nonspeech events.
    Rosenblum LD; Fowler CA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):976-85. PubMed ID: 1837308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic properties and perception of stop consonant release transients.
    Repp BH; Lin HB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):379-96. PubMed ID: 2921420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic audiovisual integration in speech perception.
    Gentilucci M; Cattaneo L
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Nov; 167(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 16034571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability and stability in the McGurk effect: contributions of participants, stimuli, time, and response type.
    Mallick DB; Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1299-307. PubMed ID: 25802068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual context effects of speech and nonspeech sounds: the role of auditory categories.
    Aravamudhan R; Lotto AJ; Hawks JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1695-703. PubMed ID: 19045660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audiovisual speech perception: Moving beyond McGurk.
    Van Engen KJ; Dey A; Sommers MS; Peelle JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec; 152(6):3216. PubMed ID: 36586857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory-visual speech perception and synchrony detection for speech and nonspeech signals.
    Conrey B; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun; 119(6):4065-73. PubMed ID: 16838548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Listening with eye and hand: cross-modal contributions to speech perception.
    Fowler CA; Dekle DJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):816-28. PubMed ID: 1834793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Weak observer-level correlation and strong stimulus-level correlation between the McGurk effect and audiovisual speech-in-noise: A causal inference explanation.
    Magnotti JF; Dzeda KB; Wegner-Clemens K; Rennig J; Beauchamp MS
    Cortex; 2020 Dec; 133():371-383. PubMed ID: 33221701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Different neural networks are involved in audiovisual speech perception depending on the context.
    Malfait N; Fonlupt P; Centelles L; Nazarian B; Brown LE; Caclin A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Jul; 26(7):1572-86. PubMed ID: 24392896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Object-based attention modulates the discrimination of level increments in stop-consonant noise bursts.
    Espinoza-Varas B; Hilton J; Guo S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190956. PubMed ID: 29364931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time course of early audiovisual interactions during speech and nonspeech central auditory processing: a magnetoencephalography study.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):259-74. PubMed ID: 18510440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in the processing of speech and nonspeech sounds by normal-hearing listeners.
    Surprenant AM; Watson CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2085-95. PubMed ID: 11681386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.