These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16922212)

  • 1. Salvage logging, ecosystem processes, and biodiversity conservation.
    Lindenmayer DB; Noss RF
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Aug; 20(4):949-58. PubMed ID: 16922212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Salvage logging in the montane ash eucalypt forests of the Central Highlands of Victoria and its potential impacts on biodiversity.
    Lindenmayer DB; Ought K
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Aug; 20(4):1005-15. PubMed ID: 16922217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preemptive and salvage harvesting of New England forests: when doing nothing is a viable alternative.
    Foster DR; Orwig DA
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Aug; 20(4):959-70. PubMed ID: 16922213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reconciling salvage logging of boreal forests with a tural-disturbance management model.
    Schmiegelow FK; Stepnisky DP; Stambaugh CA; Koivula M
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Aug; 20(4):971-83. PubMed ID: 16922214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disturbance gradient shows logging affects plant functional groups more than fire.
    Blair DP; McBurney LM; Blanchard W; Banks SC; Lindenmayer DB
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Oct; 26(7):2280-2301. PubMed ID: 27755744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postfire logging in riparian areas.
    Reeves GH; Bisson PA; Rieman BE; Benda LE
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Aug; 20(4):994-1004. PubMed ID: 16922216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An ecosystem services approach to the ecological effects of salvage logging: valuation of seed dispersal.
    Leverkus AB; Castro J
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Jun; 27(4):1057-1063. PubMed ID: 28342237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do natural disturbances or the forestry practices that follow them convert forests to early-successional communities?
    Brewer JS; Bertz CA; Cannon JB; Chesser JD; Maynard EE
    Ecol Appl; 2012 Mar; 22(2):442-58. PubMed ID: 22611846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of logging residue extraction for energy on ecosystem services and biodiversity: A synthesis.
    Ranius T; Hämäläinen A; Egnell G; Olsson B; Eklöf K; Stendahl J; Rudolphi J; Sténs A; Felton A
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Mar; 209():409-425. PubMed ID: 29309965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Limited salvage logging effects on forest regeneration after moderate-severity windthrow.
    Peterson CJ; Leach AD
    Ecol Appl; 2008 Mar; 18(2):407-20. PubMed ID: 18488605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New insights into the consequences of post-windthrow salvage logging revealed by functional structure of saproxylic beetles assemblages.
    Thorn S; Bässler C; Gottschalk T; Hothorn T; Bussler H; Raffa K; Müller J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e101757. PubMed ID: 25050914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toward meaningful snag-management guidelines for postfire salvage logging in North American conifer forests.
    Hutto RL
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Aug; 20(4):984-93. PubMed ID: 16922215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of postfire salvage logging on deadwood-associated beetles.
    Cobb TP; Morissette JL; Jacobs JM; Koivula MJ; Spence JR; Langor DW
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Feb; 25(1):94-104. PubMed ID: 20735453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the ecological impacts of salvage logging: can natural and anthropogenic disturbances promote coexistence?
    Royo AA; Peterson CJ; Stanovick JS; Carson WP
    Ecology; 2016 Jun; 97(6):1566-82. PubMed ID: 27459786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Salvage logging following fires can minimize boreal caribou habitat loss while maintaining forest quotas: An example of compensatory cumulative effects.
    Beguin J; McIntire EJ; Raulier F
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Nov; 163():234-45. PubMed ID: 26321533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forest lepidopteran communities are more resilient to shelterwood harvests compared to more intensive logging regimes.
    Summerville KS
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Jul; 23(5):1101-12. PubMed ID: 23967578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Burning of logged sites to protect beetles in managed boreal forests.
    Toivanen T; Kotiaho JS
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1562-72. PubMed ID: 18173480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Logging and fire regimes alter plant communities.
    Bowd EJ; Lindenmayer DB; Banks SC; Blair DP
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Apr; 28(3):826-841. PubMed ID: 29411919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maintaining ecosystem function and services in logged tropical forests.
    Edwards DP; Tobias JA; Sheil D; Meijaard E; Laurance WF
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2014 Sep; 29(9):511-20. PubMed ID: 25092495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does selective logging affect litter deposition rates in central Brazilian Amazonia?
    Barreiros JL; Oliveira NS; Cerboncini RAS; Klemann Junior L
    An Acad Bras Cienc; 2022; 94(3):e20201654. PubMed ID: 35857933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.