These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16922741)

  • 1. A numerical approach to resonance frequency analysis for the investigation of oral implant osseointegration.
    Natali AN; Pavan PG; Schileo E; Williams KR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Sep; 33(9):674-81. PubMed ID: 16922741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of bone-implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach.
    Natali AN; Pavan PG; Ruggero AL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16441786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parameters of implant stability measurements based on resonance frequency and damping capacity: a comparative finite element analysis.
    Winter W; Möhrle S; Holst S; Karl M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):532-9. PubMed ID: 20556252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of osseointegration degree and pattern on resonance frequency in the assessment of dental implant stability using finite element analysis.
    Deng B; Tan KB; Liu GR; Lu Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1082-8. PubMed ID: 19216277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Numerical simulation of bone regeneration in a bone chamber.
    Geris L; Vandamme K; Naert I; Vander Sloten J; Duyck J; Van Oosterwyck H
    J Dent Res; 2009 Feb; 88(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 19278988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation of the integration process of dental implants by means of a numerical analysis of dynamic response.
    Natali AN; Meroi EA; Williams KR; Calabrese L
    Dent Mater; 1997 Sep; 13(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 9823093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kong L; Hu K; Li D; Song Y; Yang J; Wu Z; Liu B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18416414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A three-dimensional finite element study on the biomechanical behavior of an FGBM dental implant in surrounding bone.
    Yang J; Xiang HJ
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(11):2377-85. PubMed ID: 17241637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dental implants as orthodontic anchorage.
    Gallas MM; Abeleira MT; Fernández JR; Burguera M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 15743858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modal analysis for implant stability assessment: Sensitivity of this methodology for different implant designs.
    Zanetti EM; Ciaramella S; Calì M; Pascoletti G; Martorelli M; Asero R; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2018 Aug; 34(8):1235-1245. PubMed ID: 29891196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pilot-hole preparation for proper implant positioning and the enhancement of bone formation.
    Horiuchi M; Ichikawa T; Kanitani HWigianto R; Kawamoto N; Matsumoto N
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 8699525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A finite element method approach for the mechanobiological modeling of the osseointegration of a dental implant.
    Vanegas-Acosta JC; Landinez P NS; Garzón-Alvarado DA; Casale R MC
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Mar; 101(3):297-314. PubMed ID: 21183241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the implant/bone interface by using natural frequency analysis.
    Huang HM; Pan LC; Lee SY; Chiu CL; Fan KH; Ho KN
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Sep; 90(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 10982948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifiable range of osseointegration of dental implants through resonance frequency analysis.
    Wang S; Liu GR; Hoang KC; Guo Y
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Dec; 32(10):1094-106. PubMed ID: 20829089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method of selecting the best implant prosthesis design option using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kregzde M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(6):662-73. PubMed ID: 8181829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of finite element analysis to model bone-implant contact with basal implants.
    Ihde S; Goldmann T; Himmlova L; Aleksic Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18439855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.