BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16922741)

  • 1. A numerical approach to resonance frequency analysis for the investigation of oral implant osseointegration.
    Natali AN; Pavan PG; Schileo E; Williams KR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Sep; 33(9):674-81. PubMed ID: 16922741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of bone-implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach.
    Natali AN; Pavan PG; Ruggero AL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16441786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parameters of implant stability measurements based on resonance frequency and damping capacity: a comparative finite element analysis.
    Winter W; Möhrle S; Holst S; Karl M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):532-9. PubMed ID: 20556252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of osseointegration degree and pattern on resonance frequency in the assessment of dental implant stability using finite element analysis.
    Deng B; Tan KB; Liu GR; Lu Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1082-8. PubMed ID: 19216277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Numerical simulation of bone regeneration in a bone chamber.
    Geris L; Vandamme K; Naert I; Vander Sloten J; Duyck J; Van Oosterwyck H
    J Dent Res; 2009 Feb; 88(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 19278988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation of the integration process of dental implants by means of a numerical analysis of dynamic response.
    Natali AN; Meroi EA; Williams KR; Calabrese L
    Dent Mater; 1997 Sep; 13(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 9823093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kong L; Hu K; Li D; Song Y; Yang J; Wu Z; Liu B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18416414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A three-dimensional finite element study on the biomechanical behavior of an FGBM dental implant in surrounding bone.
    Yang J; Xiang HJ
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(11):2377-85. PubMed ID: 17241637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dental implants as orthodontic anchorage.
    Gallas MM; Abeleira MT; Fernández JR; Burguera M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 15743858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modal analysis for implant stability assessment: Sensitivity of this methodology for different implant designs.
    Zanetti EM; Ciaramella S; Calì M; Pascoletti G; Martorelli M; Asero R; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2018 Aug; 34(8):1235-1245. PubMed ID: 29891196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pilot-hole preparation for proper implant positioning and the enhancement of bone formation.
    Horiuchi M; Ichikawa T; Kanitani HWigianto R; Kawamoto N; Matsumoto N
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 8699525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A finite element method approach for the mechanobiological modeling of the osseointegration of a dental implant.
    Vanegas-Acosta JC; Landinez P NS; Garzón-Alvarado DA; Casale R MC
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Mar; 101(3):297-314. PubMed ID: 21183241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the implant/bone interface by using natural frequency analysis.
    Huang HM; Pan LC; Lee SY; Chiu CL; Fan KH; Ho KN
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Sep; 90(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 10982948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifiable range of osseointegration of dental implants through resonance frequency analysis.
    Wang S; Liu GR; Hoang KC; Guo Y
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Dec; 32(10):1094-106. PubMed ID: 20829089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method of selecting the best implant prosthesis design option using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kregzde M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(6):662-73. PubMed ID: 8181829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of finite element analysis to model bone-implant contact with basal implants.
    Ihde S; Goldmann T; Himmlova L; Aleksic Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18439855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.