114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16922744)
1. Partial coverage restoration systems on molars--comparison of failure load after exposure to a mastication simulator.
Stappert CF; Guess PC; Chitmongkolsuk S; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Sep; 33(9):698-705. PubMed ID: 16922744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading and fracture resistance.
Stappert CF; Guess PC; Chitmongkolsuk S; Gerds T; Strub JR
Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 17380803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Longevity and failure load of ceramic veneers with different preparation designs after exposure to masticatory simulation.
Stappert CF; Ozden U; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Aug; 94(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 16046967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. All-ceramic partial coverage premolar restorations. Cavity preparation design, reliability and fracture resistance after fatigue.
Stappert CF; Guess PC; Gerds T; Strub JR
Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 16296437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ZrO2 three-unit fixed partial dentures: comparison of failure load before and after exposure to a mastication simulator.
Att W; Grigoriadou M; Strub JR
J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Apr; 34(4):282-90. PubMed ID: 17371566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survival rate and fracture strength of maxillary incisors, restored with different kinds of full veneers.
Stappert CF; Stathopoulou N; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Apr; 32(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 15790381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of bond quality on failure load of leucite- and lithia disilicate-based ceramics.
Clelland NL; Ramirez A; Katsube N; Seghi RR
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jan; 97(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17280887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture resistance of metal ceramic restorations with two different margin designs after exposure to masticatory simulation.
Michalakis KX; Stratos A; Hirayama H; Kang K; Touloumi F; Oishi Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 19703624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal adaptation of different types of all-ceramic partial coverage restorations after exposure to an artificial mouth.
Stappert CF; Denner N; Gerds T; Strub JR
Br Dent J; 2005 Dec; 199(12):779-83; discussion 777. PubMed ID: 16395369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture load and marginal fit of shrinkage-free ZrSiO4 all-ceramic crowns after chewing simulation.
Okutan M; Heydecke G; Butz F; Strub JR
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Nov; 33(11):827-32. PubMed ID: 17002742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture resistance of different partial-coverage ceramic molar restorations: An in vitro investigation.
Stappert CF; Att W; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Apr; 137(4):514-22. PubMed ID: 16637481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols.
Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Zellweger G; Büchler A; Zappini G
Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1352-61. PubMed ID: 18433859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations--midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical splitmouth study.
Guess PC; Strub JR; Steinhart N; Wolkewitz M; Stappert CF
J Dent; 2009 Aug; 37(8):627-37. PubMed ID: 19477570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of two self-adhesive cements on marginal adaptation and strength of esthetic ceramic CAD/CAM molar crowns.
Mörmann W; Wolf D; Ender A; Bindl A; Göhring T; Attin T
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):403-10. PubMed ID: 19432763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of cavity preparation design on fracture strength and mode of fracture of laboratory-processed composite resin restorations.
Fonseca RB; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Correr-Sobrinho L; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 98(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 17936127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
