These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16923181)

  • 1. Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis.
    Baltussen R; Niessen L
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2006 Aug; 4():14. PubMed ID: 16923181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Criteria Used for Priority-Setting for Public Health Resource Allocation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.
    Kaur G; Prinja S; Lakshmi PVM; Downey L; Sharma D; Teerawattananon Y
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2019; 35(6):474-483. PubMed ID: 31307561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. IMPORTANCE OF MULTIPLE CRITERIA FOR PRIORITY SETTING OF HIV/AIDS INTERVENTIONS.
    Tromp N; Prawiranegara R; Siregar A; Sunjaya D; Baltussen R
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015; 31(6):390-8. PubMed ID: 26961721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 'Real-world' health care priority setting using explicit decision criteria: a systematic review of the literature.
    Cromwell I; Peacock SJ; Mitton C
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Apr; 15():164. PubMed ID: 25927636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disease control priorities for neglected tropical diseases: lessons from priority ranking based on the quality of evidence, cost effectiveness, severity of disease, catastrophic health expenditures, and loss of productivity.
    Strømme EM; Baerøe K; Norheim OF
    Dev World Bioeth; 2014 Dec; 14(3):132-41. PubMed ID: 23724925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Priority setting in the provincial health services authority: survey of key decision makers.
    Teng F; Mitton C; Mackenzie J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jun; 7():84. PubMed ID: 17565691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How have systematic priority setting approaches influenced policy making? A synthesis of the current literature.
    Kapiriri L; Razavi D
    Health Policy; 2017 Sep; 121(9):937-946. PubMed ID: 28734682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.
    Ryan M; Scott DA; Reeves C; Bate A; van Teijlingen ER; Russell EM; Napper M; Robb CM
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(5):1-186. PubMed ID: 11262422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multi-criteria decision analysis of breast cancer control in low- and middle- income countries: development of a rating tool for policy makers.
    Venhorst K; Zelle SG; Tromp N; Lauer JA
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2014; 12():13. PubMed ID: 24855456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness analysis for priority setting in health: penny-wise but pound-foolish.
    Baltussen R; Brouwer W; Niessen L
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(4):532-4. PubMed ID: 16262980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 2. Priority setting.
    Oxman AD; Schünemann HJ; Fretheim A
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2006 Nov; 4():14. PubMed ID: 17134481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Priority setting in the Austrian healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment and implications for mental health.
    Mentzakis E; Paolucci F; Rubicko G
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2014 Jun; 17(2):61-73. PubMed ID: 25153094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
    Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness.
    Baltussen R; Jansen MP; Mikkelsen E; Tromp N; Hontelez J; Bijlmakers L; Van der Wilt GJ
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2016 Nov; 5(11):615-618. PubMed ID: 27801355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stakeholder views on criteria and processes for priority setting in Norway: a qualitative study.
    Aidem JM
    Health Policy; 2017 Jun; 121(6):683-690. PubMed ID: 28433324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding and using patient experiences as evidence in healthcare priority setting.
    Rand L; Dunn M; Slade I; Upadhyaya S; Sheehan M
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2019; 17():20. PubMed ID: 31572067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.