160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16924180)
1. Acceptability of urine-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to asymptomatic young men and their providers.
Marrazzo JM; Ellen JM; Kent C; Gaydos C; Chapin J; Dunne EF; Rietmeijer CA
Sex Transm Dis; 2007 Mar; 34(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 16924180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acceptability of urine-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic young men: a systematic review.
Marrazzo JM; Scholes D
Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Nov; 35(11 Suppl):S28-33. PubMed ID: 18418291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Home STI testing: the adolescent female's opinion.
Tebb KP; Paukku MH; Pai-Dhungat MR; Gyamfi AA; Shafer MA
J Adolesc Health; 2004 Dec; 35(6):462-7. PubMed ID: 15581525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The contribution of a urine-based jail screening program to citywide male Chlamydia and gonorrhea case rates in New York City.
Pathela P; Hennessy RR; Blank S; Parvez F; Franklin W; Schillinger JA
Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Feb; 36(2 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 17989586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acceptability of self-taken vaginal swabs and first-catch urine samples for the diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae with an amplified DNA assay in young women attending a public health sexually transmitted disease clinic.
Hoebe CJ; Rademaker CW; Brouwers EE; ter Waarbeek HL; van Bergen JE
Sex Transm Dis; 2006 Aug; 33(8):491-5. PubMed ID: 16547452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acceptability of the internet-based Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands and insights into nonresponse.
Greenland KE; Op de Coul EL; van Bergen JE; Brouwers EE; Fennema HJ; Götz HM; Hoebe CJ; Koekenbier RH; Pars LL; van Ravesteijn SM; van den Broek IV
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Jun; 38(6):467-74. PubMed ID: 21217416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mailed urine samples are not an effective screening approach for Chlamydia trachomatis case finding among young men.
Domeika M; Oscarsson L; Hallén A; Hjelm E; Sylvan S
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2007 Jul; 21(6):789-94. PubMed ID: 17567309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The English National Chlamydia Screening Programme: variations in positivity in 2007/2008.
Simms I; Talebi A; Rhia J; Horner P; French RS; Sarah R; Macintosh M
Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Aug; 36(8):522-7. PubMed ID: 19455079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of the impact of a national health demonstration project on testing and management for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in two regions of Scotland.
Penney GC; Brace V; Cameron S; Tucker J
Public Health; 2005 Nov; 119(11):1031-8. PubMed ID: 16084540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening asymptomatic adolescent men for Chlamydia trachomatis in school-based health centers using urine-based nucleic acid amplification tests.
Joffe A; Rietmeijer CA; Chung SE; Willard N; Chapin JB; Lloyd LV; Waterfield GA; Ellen JM; Gaydos C
Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Nov; 35(11 Suppl):S19-23. PubMed ID: 18716568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis infection among men attending sexually transmitted disease clinics with and without indication for testing.
Rowhani-Rahbar A; Niccolai LM; Dunne DW; Green S; Jenkins H; Khoshnood K
Int J STD AIDS; 2006 Jul; 17(7):453-8. PubMed ID: 16820074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The C-project: use of self-collection kits to screen for Chlamydia trachomatis in young people in a community-based health promotion project.
Martin L; Freedman E; Burton L; Rutter S; Knight V; D'Amato A; Murray C; Drysdale J; Harvey S; McNulty A
Sex Health; 2009 Jun; 6(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 19457296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What about the men?
Dunne EF; Gift TL; Stamm WE
Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Nov; 35(11 Suppl):S1-2. PubMed ID: 18813144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Men's attitudes towards chlamydia screening: a narrative review.
Balfe M; Brugha R; O'Connell E; Vaughan D; O'Donovan D
Sex Health; 2012 May; 9(2):120-30. PubMed ID: 22498155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening adolescent males for Chlamydia on admission to detention.
Blake DR; Gaydos CA; Quinn TC
Sex Transm Dis; 2004 Feb; 31(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 14743071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Examination of the treatment and follow-up care for adolescents who test positive for Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
Hwang LY; Tebb KP; Shafer MA; Pantell RH
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2005 Dec; 159(12):1162-6. PubMed ID: 16330741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The differing profiles of symptomatic and asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis-infected men in a clinical setting.
Chen MY; Rohrsheim R; Donovan B
Int J STD AIDS; 2007 Jun; 18(6):384-8. PubMed ID: 17609026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in young men attending an emergency department.
Sood T; Sally D; Spencer N; Banerjee A; Hinchley G
Emerg Med J; 2008 Jul; 25(7):428-30. PubMed ID: 18573958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Chlamydia trachomatis infection in central Norway--testing patterns and prevalence].
Bakken IJ; Nordbø SA
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Dec; 127(24):3202-5. PubMed ID: 18084360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening for chlamydia trachomatis: barriers for homeless young people.
Henning D; Alice R; Sanci L; Dunning T
Aust J Adv Nurs; 2007; 24(3):8-13. PubMed ID: 17518159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
