384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16924209)
1. Clinical results of total lumbar disc replacement with ProDisc II: three-year results for different indications.
Siepe CJ; Mayer HM; Wiechert K; Korge A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(17):1923-32. PubMed ID: 16924209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels.
Siepe CJ; Mayer HM; Heinz-Leisenheimer M; Korge A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):782-90. PubMed ID: 17414914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamics of improvement following total lumbar disc replacement: is the outcome predictable?
Siepe CJ; Tepass A; Hitzl W; Meschede P; Beisse R; Korge A; Mayer HM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2579-86. PubMed ID: 19927108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease.
Zigler J; Delamarter R; Spivak JM; Linovitz RJ; Danielson GO; Haider TT; Cammisa F; Zuchermann J; Balderston R; Kitchel S; Foley K; Watkins R; Bradford D; Yue J; Yuan H; Herkowitz H; Geiger D; Bendo J; Peppers T; Sachs B; Girardi F; Kropf M; Goldstein J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11):1155-62; discussion 1163. PubMed ID: 17495770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The fate of facet joint and adjacent level disc degeneration following total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective clinical, X-ray, and magnetic resonance imaging investigation.
Siepe CJ; Zelenkov P; Sauri-Barraza JC; Szeimies U; Grubinger T; Tepass A; Stäbler A; Mayer MH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Oct; 35(22):1991-2003. PubMed ID: 20881662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up.
Siepe CJ; Heider F; Wiechert K; Hitzl W; Ishak B; Mayer MH
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1417-31. PubMed ID: 24448028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CHARITE versus ProDisc: a comparative study of a minimum 3-year follow-up.
Shim CS; Lee SH; Shin HD; Kang HS; Choi WC; Jung B; Choi G; Ahn Y; Lee S; Lee HY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(9):1012-8. PubMed ID: 17450077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.
Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Shah RV; Nanieva R; Pfeiffer F; Fenk-Mayer A; Kershaw T; Husted DS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Oct; 30(19):2192-9. PubMed ID: 16205346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcome of lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc-L in degenerative disc disease: minimum 5-year follow-up results at a single institute.
Park CK; Ryu KS; Lee KY; Lee HJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(8):672-7. PubMed ID: 21857395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Asymptomatic same-site recurrent disc herniation after lumbar discectomy: results of a prospective longitudinal study with 2-year serial imaging.
Lebow RL; Adogwa O; Parker SL; Sharma A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):2147-51. PubMed ID: 21343849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.
Delamarter R; Zigler JE; Balderston RA; Cammisa FP; Goldstein JA; Spivak JM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Total disc prosthesis for painful degenerative lumbar disc disease].
Karatoprak O; Aydoğan M; Oztürk C; Mirzanli C; Tezer M; Hamzaoğlu A
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2007; 41(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 18180557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty in patients older than 60 years of age: a prospective study of the ProDisc prosthesis with 2-year minimum follow-up period.
Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Nanieva R; Fenk-Mayer A; Husted DS; Shah RV; Emerson JW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Feb; 4(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 16506473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration on the outcome of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective clinical, histological, X-ray and MRI investigation.
Siepe CJ; Heider F; Haas E; Hitzl W; Szeimies U; Stäbler A; Weiler C; Nerlich AG; Mayer MH
Eur Spine J; 2012 Nov; 21(11):2287-99. PubMed ID: 22644434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low back pain after lumbar discectomy in patients showing endplate modic type 1 change.
Ohtori S; Yamashita M; Yamauchi K; Inoue G; Koshi T; Suzuki M; Orita S; Eguchi Y; Ochiai N; Kishida S; Takaso M; Aoki Y; Ishikawa T; Arai G; Miyagi M; Kamoda H; Nakamura J; Takahashi K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(13):E596-600. PubMed ID: 20461034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lumbar total disc replacement. Surgical technique.
Tropiano P; Huang RC; Girardi FP; Cammisa FP; Marnay T
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Mar; 88 Suppl 1 Pt 1():50-64. PubMed ID: 16510800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective cohort study of close interval computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging after primary lumbar discectomy: factors associated with recurrent disc herniation and disc height loss.
McGirt MJ; Eustacchio S; Varga P; Vilendecic M; Trummer M; Gorensek M; Ledic D; Carragee EJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(19):2044-51. PubMed ID: 19730212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Success of lumbar microdiscectomy in patients with modic changes and low-back pain: a prospective pilot study.
Chin KR; Tomlinson DT; Auerbach JD; Shatsky JB; Deirmengian CA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr; 21(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 18391720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
