423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16924300)
21. Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol).
Galipeau J; Moher D; Skidmore B; Campbell C; Hendry P; Cameron DW; Hébert PC; Palepu A
Syst Rev; 2013 Jun; 2():41. PubMed ID: 23773340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Analysis on published papers and its citation in Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control, 2008-2010].
Zhou XO; Hu F; Jiang LX
Zhongguo Xue Xi Chong Bing Fang Zhi Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 23(3):324-6, 329. PubMed ID: 22164506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Quantitative parameters to evaluate the publication of scientific papers].
Petroianu A
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2003; 49(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 12886395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reasons for Manuscript Rejection After Peer Review From the Journal Headache.
Hesterman CM; Szperka CL; Turner DP
Headache; 2018 Nov; 58(10):1511-1518. PubMed ID: 30011058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Commercially funded and United States-based research is more likely to be published; good-quality studies with negative outcomes are not.
Lynch JR; Cunningham MR; Warme WJ; Schaad DC; Wolf FM; Leopold SS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 May; 89(5):1010-8. PubMed ID: 17473138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Update on the Manuscript Peer Review Process.
Elmore SA
Toxicol Pathol; 2017 Dec; 45(8):1028-1031. PubMed ID: 29145784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003.
Liesegang TJ; Shaikh M; Crook JE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 17276380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The European Heart Journal on the move: can scientific publishing be further improved?
Lüscher TF; Gersh B; Hindricks G; Landmesser U; Nallamothu B; Ruschitzka F; Wijns W
Eur Heart J; 2013 Feb; 34(6):409-15. PubMed ID: 23132609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The fate of epidemiologic manuscripts: a study of papers submitted to epidemiology.
Hall SA; Wilcox AJ
Epidemiology; 2007 Mar; 18(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 17301708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. European urology: quality, impact, online.
Catto JW; Montorsi F; Schulman C
Eur Urol; 2013 Oct; 64(4):523-4. PubMed ID: 23928576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study.
Glonti K; Hren D
BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e020568. PubMed ID: 30341111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Why and how to avoid a desk-rejection.
Lake ET
Res Nurs Health; 2020 Apr; 43(2):141-142. PubMed ID: 32103510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals.
Galipeau J; Barbour V; Baskin P; Bell-Syer S; Cobey K; Cumpston M; Deeks J; Garner P; MacLehose H; Shamseer L; Straus S; Tugwell P; Wager E; Winker M; Moher D
BMC Med; 2016 Feb; 14():16. PubMed ID: 26837937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation.
Falagas ME; Alexiou VG
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2008; 56(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 18661263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Improving publication rates in a collaborative clinical trials research network.
Archer SW; Carlo WA; Truog WE; Stevenson DK; Van Meurs KP; Sánchez PJ; Das A; Devaskar U; Nelin LD; Petrie Huitema CM; Crawford MM; Higgins RD;
Semin Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 40(6):410-417. PubMed ID: 27423510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology.
Galipeau J; Moher D; Campbell C; Hendry P; Cameron DW; Palepu A; Hébert PC
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 68(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 25510373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. What weight does impact factor carry?
Aase S
J Am Diet Assoc; 2008 Oct; 108(10):1604-7. PubMed ID: 18926118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
Newton DP
Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):130-45. PubMed ID: 20461569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [How to improve the statistical quality of articles presented to biomedical journals: a checklist for authors].
Mora i Ripoll R
Med Clin (Barc); 1999 Jul; 113(4):138-49. PubMed ID: 10472600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Significance of letters published in the Dutch Journal of Medicine, 1997/98].
Mahesh S; Kabos M; Walvoort HC; Overbeke AJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Mar; 145(11):531-5. PubMed ID: 11284288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
