955 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16924979)
21. Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 16005793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions.
Kubo S; Yokota H; Yokota H; Hayashi Y
J Dent; 2010 Mar; 38(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 19840829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations.
Brackett WW; Dib A; Brackett MG; Reyes AA; Estrada BE
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin composites in Class I restorations: three-year results of a randomized, double-blind and controlled clinical trial.
Shi L; Wang X; Zhao Q; Zhang Y; Zhang L; Ren Y; Chen Z
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 20166406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials--3-year results.
Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar; 5(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11355096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Five-year clinical evaluation of One-Up Bond F in non-carious cervical lesions.
Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
Am J Dent; 2007 Dec; 20(6):361-4. PubMed ID: 18269125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF
J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions.
van Dijken JW
Dent Mater; 2000 Jul; 16(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 10831784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions.
Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estrada BE; Brackett WW
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Resin modified glass ionomer restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions have similar if not better retention rates than resin composites (UT CAT #628).
Price J; Kinard S; Haveman C
Tex Dent J; 2012 Mar; 129(3):284. PubMed ID: 22667062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A retrospective clinical study of cervical restorations: longevity and failure-prognostic variables.
Namgung C; Rho YJ; Jin BH; Lim BS; Cho BH
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(4):376-85. PubMed ID: 23215544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Three-year prospective clinical performance of a one-step self-etch adhesive and a nanofiller hybrid resin composite in Class V lesions.
Preussker S; Pöschmann M; Kensche A; Natusch I; Koch R; Klimm W; Hannig C
Am J Dent; 2014 Apr; 27(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 25000664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations: one-year results.
Baracco B; Perdigão J; Cabrera E; Giráldez I; Ceballos L
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 22313275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
Moosavi H; Ghavamnasiri M; Manari V
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis.
Ritter AV; Heymann HO; Swift EJ; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(4):370-8. PubMed ID: 18666493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation.
van Dijken JW; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; Lindberg A
Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1101-7. PubMed ID: 17113139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions.
Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Gregory PN; Owens BM
Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 10649933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical performance of Class II restorations in which resin composite is laminated over resin-modified glass-ionomer.
Aboush YE; Torabzadeh H
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 11203844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A randomized clinical evaluation of a one- and two-step self-etch adhesive over 24 months.
Loguercio AD; Mânica D; Ferneda F; Zander-Grande C; Amaral R; Stanislawczuk R; de Carvalho RM; Manso A; Reis A
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 20533625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
