These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16925361)
1. Staple line reinforcement with new biomaterial increased burst strength pressure: an animal study. Pinheiro JS; Correa JL; Cohen RV; Novaes JA; Schiavon CA Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2006; 2(3):397-9, discussion 400. PubMed ID: 16925361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Increased burst pressure in gastrointestinal staple-lines using reinforcement with a bioprosthetic material. Downey DM; Harre JG; Dolan JP Obes Surg; 2005; 15(10):1379-83. PubMed ID: 16354515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of permanent and nonpermanent staple line buttressing materials for linear gastric staple lines during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Shikora SA; Kim JJ; Tarnoff ME Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2008; 4(6):729-34. PubMed ID: 18586575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of burst pressure between buttressed versus non-buttressed staple-lines in an animal model. Arnold W; Shikora SA Obes Surg; 2005 Feb; 15(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 15802057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement for laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. Nguyen NT; Longoria M; Chalifoux S; Wilson SE Surg Technol Int; 2005; 14():107-11. PubMed ID: 16525961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Profiling surgical staplers: effect of staple height, buttress, and overlap on staple line failure. Mery CM; Shafi BM; Binyamin G; Morton JM; Gertner M Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2008; 4(3):416-22. PubMed ID: 18226977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gastrointestinal staple line reinforcement. Downey DM; Ali S; Goldblatt MI; Saxe JM; Dolan JP Surg Technol Int; 2007; 16():55-60. PubMed ID: 17429769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Buttressing of the staple line in gastrointestinal anastomoses: overview of new technology designed to reduce perioperative complications. Yo LS; Consten EC; Quarles van Ufford HM; Gooszen HG; Gagner M Dig Surg; 2006; 23(5-6):283-91. PubMed ID: 17079860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical results using bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement for circular staplers. Jones WB; Myers KM; Traxler LB; Bour ES Am Surg; 2008 Jun; 74(6):462-7; discussion 467-8. PubMed ID: 18556986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Staple-line reinforcement techniques with different buttressing materials used for laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery: a new strategy to diminish perioperative complications. Consten EC; Gagner M Surg Technol Int; 2004; 13():59-63. PubMed ID: 15744676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Functional comparison of staple line reinforcements in lung resection. Downey DM; Harre JG; Pratt JW Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Nov; 82(5):1880-3. PubMed ID: 17062265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bioabsorbable staple-line reinforcement to reduce staple-line bleeding in the transection of mesenteric vessels during laparoscopic colorectal resection: a pilot study. de la Portilla F; Zbar AP; Rada R; Vega J; Cisneros N; Maldonado VH; Utrera A; Espinosa E Tech Coloproctol; 2006 Dec; 10(4):335-8. PubMed ID: 17115313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Functional assessment of a new staple line reinforcement in lung resection. Downey DM; Michel M; Harre JG; Pratt JW J Surg Res; 2006 Mar; 131(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 16129450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is staple line reinforcement still needed on contemporary staplers? A benchtop analysis. Chand B; Meyers C Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1274-1281. PubMed ID: 36175699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of laparoscopic linear staplers in clinical practice. Simper SC; Erzinger JM; Smith SC Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2007; 3(4):446-50; discussion 450-1. PubMed ID: 17400029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An update of available innovative staple line reinforcement materials in colorectal surgery. Cheragwandi A; Nieuwenhuis DH; Gagner M; Consten EC Surg Technol Int; 2008; 17():131-7. PubMed ID: 18802893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Bursting pressure comparison between stapler and staple line reinforcement with sutures and butress biologic material: an experimental study]. Martins MV; Skinovsky J; Chibata M Arq Bras Cir Dig; 2013 Jun; 26(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 24000016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ex vivo pneumostasis evaluation of a variable-height staple design. Contini E; Godek ML; Whiffen JM; Bronson DG Innovations (Phila); 2013; 8(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 24145973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of bioabsorbable staple reinforcement material in gastric bypass: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Miller KA; Pump A Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2007; 3(4):417-21; discussion 422. PubMed ID: 17567538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Staple-line reinforcement with a new type of polyglycolic acid felt. Kawamura M; Kase K; Sawafuji M; Watanabe M; Horinouchi H; Kobayashi K Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2001 Feb; 11(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 11269555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]