These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16926322)
1. Clinical breast examination in a comprehensive breast cancer screening program: contribution and cost. Feigin KN; Keating DM; Telford PM; Cohen MA Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):650-5. PubMed ID: 16926322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India. Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A model-based comparison of breast cancer screening strategies: mammograms and clinical breast examinations. Shen Y; Parmigiani G Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Feb; 14(2):529-32. PubMed ID: 15734983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical and self breast examination remain important in the era of modern screening. Ma I; Dueck A; Gray R; Wasif N; Giurescu M; Lorans R; Pizzitola V; Pockaj B Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1484-90. PubMed ID: 22160521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening. Chiarelli AM; Majpruz V; Brown P; Thériault M; Shumak R; Mai V J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(18):1236-43. PubMed ID: 19720967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Lehman CD; Blume JD; Weatherall P; Thickman D; Hylton N; Warner E; Pisano E; Schnitt SJ; Gatsonis C; Schnall M; DeAngelis GA; Stomper P; Rosen EL; O'Loughlin M; Harms S; Bluemke DA; Cancer; 2005 May; 103(9):1898-905. PubMed ID: 15800894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial. Kuhl C; Weigel S; Schrading S; Arand B; Bieling H; König R; Tombach B; Leutner C; Rieber-Brambs A; Nordhoff D; Heindel W; Reiser M; Schild HH J Clin Oncol; 2010 Mar; 28(9):1450-7. PubMed ID: 20177029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imaging of breast cancer diagnosed and treated with chemotherapy during pregnancy. Yang WT; Dryden MJ; Gwyn K; Whitman GJ; Theriault R Radiology; 2006 Apr; 239(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 16484353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short report: Limited effectiveness of screening mammography in addition to clinical breast examination by trained nurse midwives in rural Jakarta, Indonesia. Kardinah D; Anderson BO; Duggan C; Ali IA; Thomas DB Int J Cancer; 2014 Mar; 134(5):1250-5. PubMed ID: 24037942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening clinical breast examination: how often does it miss lethal breast cancer? Fenton JJ; Barton MB; Geiger AM; Herrinton LJ; Rolnick SJ; Harris EL; Barlow WE; Reisch LM; Fletcher SW; Elmore JG J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):67-71. PubMed ID: 16287888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contribution of clinical breast examination to mammography screening in the early detection of breast cancer. Bancej C; Decker K; Chiarelli A; Harrison M; Turner D; Brisson J J Med Screen; 2003; 10(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 12790311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection? Mouchawar J; Taplin S; Ichikawa L; Barlow WE; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Manos MM; Ulcickas Yood M J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):39-46. PubMed ID: 16287884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The incremental contribution of clinical breast examination to invasive cancer detection in a mammography screening program. Oestreicher N; Lehman CD; Seger DJ; Buist DS; White E AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):428-32. PubMed ID: 15671358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-aided detection of breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness study. Lindfors KK; McGahan MC; Rosenquist CJ; Hurlock GS Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):710-7. PubMed ID: 16569787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Results of MRI screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with LCIS and atypical hyperplasia. Port ER; Park A; Borgen PI; Morris E; Montgomery LL Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1051-7. PubMed ID: 17206485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical breast examination for screening of asymptomatic women: the importance of clinical breast examination for breast cancer detection. Park BW; Kim SI; Kim MH; Kim EK; Park SH; Lee KS Yonsei Med J; 2000 Jun; 41(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 10957884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Induced costs of low-cost screening mammography. Cyrlak D Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):661-3. PubMed ID: 3406395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tumor size and breast cancer detection: what might be the effect of a less sensitive screening tool than mammography? Duffy SW; Tabar L; Vitak B; Warwick J Breast J; 2006; 12 Suppl 1():S91-5. PubMed ID: 16430402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Developing asymmetry identified on mammography: correlation with imaging outcome and pathologic findings. Leung JW; Sickles EA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):667-75. PubMed ID: 17312052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unilateral breast cancer: screening of contralateral breast by using preoperative MR imaging reduces incidence of metachronous cancer. Kim JY; Cho N; Koo HR; Yi A; Kim WH; Lee SH; Chang JM; Han W; Moon HG; Im SA; Noh DY; Moon WK Radiology; 2013 Apr; 267(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 23329656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]