418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16926474)
1. The debate on the use of linear no threshold for assessing the effects of low doses.
Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 16926474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. LNT--an apparent rather than a real controversy?
Charles MW
J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 16926475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Update on linear non-threshold dose-response model and implications for diagnostic radiology procedures.
Preston RJ
Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 18849687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does scientific evidence support a change from the LNT model for low-dose radiation risk extrapolation?
Averbeck D
Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):493-504. PubMed ID: 19820459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recent reports on the effect of low doses of ionizing radiation and its dose-effect relationship.
Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 16468064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low-dose radiation risk extrapolation fallacy associated with the linear-no-threshold model.
Scott BR
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 18480143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Prevention of cancer and the dose-effect relationship: the carcinogenic effects of ionizing radiations].
Tubiana M
Cancer Radiother; 2009 Jul; 13(4):238-58. PubMed ID: 19539515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Economic and policy considerations drive the LNT debate.
Mossman KL
Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):245; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 18220464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Biological Effects From Low Doses and Dose Rates of Ionizing Radiation: Science in the Service of Protecting Humans, a Synopsis.
Feinendegen LE; Cuttler JM
Health Phys; 2018 Jun; 114(6):623-626. PubMed ID: 29521814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of low level radiation-what's new?
Royal HD
Semin Nucl Med; 2008 Sep; 38(5):392-402. PubMed ID: 18662560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating risk of low radiation doses - a critical review of the BEIR VII report and its use of the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis.
Calabrese EJ; O'Connor MK
Radiat Res; 2014 Nov; 182(5):463-74. PubMed ID: 25329961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Carcinogenic effects of low-level ionizing radiation: problems and prospects.
Upton AC
In Vivo; 2002; 16(6):527-33. PubMed ID: 12494897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific foundation of regulating ionizing radiation: application of metrics for evaluation of regulatory science information.
Moghissi AA; Gerraa VK; McBride DK; Swetnam M
Health Phys; 2014 Nov; 107(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 25271928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiation doses and risks from internal emitters.
Harrison J; Day P
J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):137-59. PubMed ID: 18495991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The road to linearity: why linearity at low doses became the basis for carcinogen risk assessment.
Calabrese EJ
Arch Toxicol; 2009 Mar; 83(3):203-25. PubMed ID: 19247635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biological effects of low level exposures to ionizing radiation: theory and practice.
Liu SZ
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 29(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 20332172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two principal considerations are needed after low doses of ionizing radiation.
Feinendegen LE; Paretzke H; Neumann RD
Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):247-8. PubMed ID: 18220467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Regulatory implications of a linear non-threshold (LNT) dose-based risks.
Aleta CR
Appl Radiat Isot; 2009; 67(7-8):1290-8. PubMed ID: 19299154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Epidemiologic data on radiation-induced breast cancer].
Telle-Lamberton M
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2008 Aug; 56(4):235-43. PubMed ID: 18672338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hypothesis testing and the choice of the dose-response model.
Oughton D
Toxicol Lett; 2006 Mar; 162(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 16325358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
