These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Focus shifts to device fragments, small miscellaneous items in RSIs. Mathias JM OR Manager; 2013 Jul; 29(7):1,10-2. PubMed ID: 23926640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Did we forget something? AORN J; 2010 May; 91(5):644-583. PubMed ID: 20451008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Minnesota takes extra steps on wrong surgery, retained items. OR Manager; 2005 Apr; 21(4):1, 18-20. PubMed ID: 15909366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Governing the surgical count through communication interactions: implications for patient safety. Riley R; Manias E; Polglase A Qual Saf Health Care; 2006 Oct; 15(5):369-74. PubMed ID: 17074876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Projects for improving safety of counts in the OR. OR Manager; 2003 Mar; 19(3):11-2. PubMed ID: 12661499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Preventable errors in the operating room: retained foreign bodies after surgery--Part I. Gibbs VC; Coakley FD; Reines HD Curr Probl Surg; 2007 May; 44(5):281-337. PubMed ID: 17512832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. SURGICAL COUNTING: A PERIOPERATIVE NURSE'S PERSPECTIVE. Warwick V; Gillespie B Aust Nurs Midwifery J; 2017 May; 24(10):39. PubMed ID: 29280599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Beyond counting: current evidence on the problem of retaining foreign bodies in surgery? Greenberg CC; Gawande AA Ann Surg; 2008 Jan; 247(1):19-20. PubMed ID: 18156917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]