These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16927621)

  • 1. [The effect of musical practice on speech recognition in quiet and noisy situations].
    Soncini F; Costa MJ
    Pro Fono; 2006; 18(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 16927621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.
    Parbery-Clark A; Skoe E; Lam C; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 19734788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acclimatization effect in speech recognition: evaluation without hearing aids.
    Santos SN; Petry T; Costa MJ
    Pro Fono; 2010; 22(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 21271114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech recognition thresholds in noisy areas: reference values for normal hearing adults.
    Henriques MO; Miranda EC; Costa MJ
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2008; 74(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 18568195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhanced speech perception in noise and cortical auditory evoked potentials in professional musicians.
    Meha-Bettison K; Sharma M; Ibrahim RK; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 28971719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity to Melody, Rhythm, and Beat in Supporting Speech-in-Noise Perception in Young Adults.
    Yates KM; Moore DR; Amitay S; Barry JG
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):358-367. PubMed ID: 29965864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Musical training, individual differences and the cocktail party problem.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Kidd G; Patel AD
    Sci Rep; 2015 Jun; 5():11628. PubMed ID: 26112910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of Musical Training and Working Memory in Adverse Listening Situations.
    Escobar J; Mussoi BS; Silberer AB
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):278-288. PubMed ID: 32106117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Musical training improves the ability to understand speech-in-noise in older adults.
    Zendel BR; West GL; Belleville S; Peretz I
    Neurobiol Aging; 2019 Sep; 81():102-115. PubMed ID: 31280114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hearing in Noise Test Brazil: standardization for young adults with normal hearing.
    Sbompato AF; Corteletti LC; Moret Ade L; Jacob RT
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2015; 81(4):384-8. PubMed ID: 26130593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise.
    Nilsson M; Soli SD; Sullivan JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):1085-99. PubMed ID: 8132902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefits of spatial hearing to speech recognition in young people with normal hearing.
    Song PL; Li HJ; Wang NY
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Dec; 124(24):4269-74. PubMed ID: 22340398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use.
    MacLeod A; Summerfield Q
    Br J Audiol; 1990 Feb; 24(1):29-43. PubMed ID: 2317599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of companding on speech recognition in quiet and noise for listeners with ANSD.
    Narne VK; Barman A; Deepthi M
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 24237041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise.
    Yeend I; Beach EF; Sharma M; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():224-236. PubMed ID: 28780178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
    Zokoll MA; Fidan D; Türkyılmaz D; Hochmuth S; Ergenç İ; Sennaroğlu G; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative contributions of auditory and cognitive functions on speech recognition in quiet and in noise among older adults.
    Mukari SZMS; Yusof Y; Ishak WS; Maamor N; Chellapan K; Dzulkifli MA
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2020; 86(2):149-156. PubMed ID: 30558985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.