361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16928277)
1. Assessment of whole genome amplification-induced bias through high-throughput, massively parallel whole genome sequencing.
Pinard R; de Winter A; Sarkis GJ; Gerstein MB; Tartaro KR; Plant RN; Egholm M; Rothberg JM; Leamon JH
BMC Genomics; 2006 Aug; 7():216. PubMed ID: 16928277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of REPLI-g Multiple Displacement Whole Genome Amplification (WGA) Techniques for Metagenomic Applications.
Ahsanuddin S; Afshinnekoo E; Gandara J; Hakyemezoğlu M; Bezdan D; Minot S; Greenfield N; Mason CE
J Biomol Tech; 2017 Apr; 28(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 28344519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of whole genome amplified (WGA) DNA for use in genotyping assay development.
Han T; Chang CW; Kwekel JC; Chen Y; Ge Y; Martinez-Murillo F; Roscoe D; Težak Z; Philip R; Bijwaard K; Fuscoe JC
BMC Genomics; 2012 Jun; 13():217. PubMed ID: 22655855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Phi29-based whole-genome amplification for microarray-based comparative genomic hybridisation.
Arriola E; Lambros MB; Jones C; Dexter T; Mackay A; Tan DS; Tamber N; Fenwick K; Ashworth A; Dowsett M; Reis-Filho JS
Lab Invest; 2007 Jan; 87(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 17170740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bias in Whole Genome Amplification: Causes and Considerations.
Sabina J; Leamon JH
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1347():15-41. PubMed ID: 26374307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of 3 methods of whole-genome amplification for subsequent metaphase comparative genomic hybridization.
Ng G; Roberts I; Coleman N
Diagn Mol Pathol; 2005 Dec; 14(4):203-12. PubMed ID: 16319690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A procedure for highly specific, sensitive, and unbiased whole-genome amplification.
Pan X; Urban AE; Palejev D; Schulz V; Grubert F; Hu Y; Snyder M; Weissman SM
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Oct; 105(40):15499-504. PubMed ID: 18832167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization of DOP-PCR amplification of DNA for high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization analysis.
Larsen J; Ottesen AM; Lundsteen C; Leffers H; Larsen JK
Cytometry; 2001 Aug; 44(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 11500848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Whole Genome Amplification by Isothermal Multiple Strand Displacement Using Phi29 DNA Polymerase.
Kroneis T; El-Heliebi A
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1347():111-7. PubMed ID: 26374313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deterministic Whole-Genome Amplification of Single Cells.
Czyż ZT; Klein CA
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1347():69-86. PubMed ID: 26374310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of bias induced by viral enrichment and random amplification protocols in metagenomic surveys of saliva DNA viruses.
Parras-Moltó M; Rodríguez-Galet A; Suárez-Rodríguez P; López-Bueno A
Microbiome; 2018 Jun; 6(1):119. PubMed ID: 29954453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of whole genome amplification for sequence capture and massively parallel sequencing.
Hasmats J; Gréen H; Orear C; Validire P; Huss M; Käller M; Lundeberg J
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e84785. PubMed ID: 24409309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Whole-genome amplification-based GenomiPhi for multiple genomic analysis of individual early porcine embryos.
Akasaka E; Ozawa A; Mori H; Mizobe Y; Yoshida M; Miyoshi K; Sato M
Theriogenology; 2011 May; 75(8):1543-9. PubMed ID: 21354605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Whole genome amplification for CGH analysis: Linker-adapter PCR as the method of choice for difficult and limited samples.
Pirker C; Raidl M; Steiner E; Elbling L; Holzmann K; Spiegl-Kreinecker S; Aubele M; Grasl-Kraupp B; Marosi C; Micksche M; Berger W
Cytometry A; 2004 Sep; 61(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 15351986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monodisperse Picoliter Droplets for Low-Bias and Contamination-Free Reactions in Single-Cell Whole Genome Amplification.
Nishikawa Y; Hosokawa M; Maruyama T; Yamagishi K; Mori T; Takeyama H
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138733. PubMed ID: 26389587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR-comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA copy number changes in tumors.
Huang Q; Schantz SP; Rao PH; Mo J; McCormick SA; Chaganti RS
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2000 Aug; 28(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 10862048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primer design for Whole Genome Amplification using genetic algorithms.
Png AE; Choo KW; Lee CI; Leong SH; Kon OL
In Silico Biol; 2006; 6(6):505-14. PubMed ID: 17518761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhanced sequencing coverage with digital droplet multiple displacement amplification.
Sidore AM; Lan F; Lim SW; Abate AR
Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Apr; 44(7):e66. PubMed ID: 26704978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Whole genome amplification induced bias in the detection of KRAS-mutated cell populations during colorectal carcinoma tissue testing.
Stranska J; Jancik S; Slavkovsky R; Holinkova V; Rabcanova M; Vojta P; Hajduch M; Drabek J
Electrophoresis; 2015 Mar; 36(6):937-40. PubMed ID: 25655305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiple displacement amplification as an aid in checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization.
Teles F; Haffajee AD; Socransky SS
Oral Microbiol Immunol; 2007 Apr; 22(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 17311635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
