147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16928904)
1. Value of adding T1-weighted image to MR cholangiopancreatography for detecting intrahepatic biliary stones.
Kim YK; Kim CS; Lee JM; Ko SW; Chung GH; Lee SO; Han YM; Lee SY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):W267-74. PubMed ID: 16928904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic value of T1-weighted gradient-echo in-phase images added to MRCP in differentiation of hepatolithiasis and intrahepatic pneumobilia.
Erden A; Haliloğlu N; Genç Y; Erden I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jan; 202(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 24370131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnosis of intrahepatic stones: superiority of MR cholangiopancreatography over endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Kim TK; Kim BS; Kim JH; Ha HK; Kim PN; Kim AY; Lee MG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Aug; 179(2):429-34. PubMed ID: 12130445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preoperative evaluation of bile duct cancer: MRI combined with MR cholangiopancreatography versus MDCT with direct cholangiography.
Park HS; Lee JM; Choi JY; Lee MW; Kim HJ; Han JK; Choi BI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):396-405. PubMed ID: 18212225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for locating hepatolithiasis and detecting accompanying biliary strictures.
Park DH; Kim MH; Lee SS; Lee SK; Kim KP; Han JM; Kim SY; Song MH; Seo DW; Kim AY; Kim TK; Min YI
Endoscopy; 2004 Nov; 36(11):987-92. PubMed ID: 15520917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant distal biliary strictures: value of adding diffusion-weighted imaging to conventional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
Yoo RE; Lee JM; Yoon JH; Kim JH; Han JK; Choi BI
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(6):1509-17. PubMed ID: 24136813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Diagnosis of common bile duct stones by MR imaging, mainly MR cholangiopancreatography].
Isomoto I; Koshiishi T; Fukuda T; Hayashi K
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Sep; 58(11):566-71. PubMed ID: 9796263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: value of MR cholangiography.
Guibaud L; Bret PM; Reinhold C; Atri M; Barkun AN
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):847-50. PubMed ID: 8092021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study with MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T for clinical patients.
Onishi H; Kim T; Hori M; Murakami T; Tatsumi M; Nakaya Y; Nakamoto A; Osuga K; Tomoda K; Nakamura H
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):559-65. PubMed ID: 19692840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study of magnetic resonance cholangiography and direct cholangiography.
Alcaraz MJ; De la Morena EJ; Polo A; Ramos A; De la Cal MA; González Mandly A
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2000 Jul; 92(7):427-38. PubMed ID: 11026760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases.
Lomanto D; Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Mazzocchi P; Fiocca F; Lezoche E; Passariello R; Speranza V
Am J Surg; 1997 Jul; 174(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9240949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography.
Kondo S; Isayama H; Akahane M; Toda N; Sasahira N; Nakai Y; Yamamoto N; Hirano K; Komatsu Y; Tada M; Yoshida H; Kawabe T; Ohtomo K; Omata M
Eur J Radiol; 2005 May; 54(2):271-5. PubMed ID: 15837409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of three-dimensional negative-contrast CT cholangiopancreatography with three-dimensional MR cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of obstructive biliary diseases.
Zhang ZY; Wang D; Ni JM; Yu XR; Zhang L; Wu WJ; Gong L; Hu MH
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):830-7. PubMed ID: 21377820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the imaging of the axial biliary tree in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis.
Mofidi R; Lee AC; Madhavan KK; Garden OJ; Parks RW
Pancreatology; 2008; 8(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 18253063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [MRCP in primary sclerosing cholangitis].
Weber C; Krupski G; Lorenzen J; Grotelüschen R; Seitz U; Rogiers X; Adam G
Rofo; 2003 Feb; 175(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 12584620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of a new sequence of magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography in thick cut and one shot acquisition].
Mougenel JL; Hudziak H; Ernst O; Dupas B; Lefevre F; Barraud H; Watelet J; Cezard O; Regent D; Bigard MA
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2000 Oct; 24(10):888-95. PubMed ID: 11084424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of biliary stenoses in patients after liver transplantation: is there a different diagnostic accuracy of MRCP depending on the type of biliary anastomosis?
Kinner S; Dechêne A; Paul A; Umutlu L; Ladd SC; de Dechêne EM; Zöpf T; Gerken G; Lauenstein TC
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):e20-8. PubMed ID: 20580506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biliary dilatation: differentiation of benign from malignant causes--value of adding conventional MR imaging to MR cholangiopancreatography.
Kim MJ; Mitchell DG; Ito K; Outwater EK
Radiology; 2000 Jan; 214(1):173-81. PubMed ID: 10644119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to detect bile duct stones in acute biliary pancreatitis.
Lee SL; Kim HK; Choi HH; Jeon BS; Kim TH; Choi JM; Ku YM; Kim SW; Kim SS; Chae HS
Pancreatology; 2018 Jan; 18(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 29246689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography accurately detects common bile duct stones in resolving gallstone pancreatitis.
Hallal AH; Amortegui JD; Jeroukhimov IM; Casillas J; Schulman CI; Manning RJ; Habib FA; Lopez PP; Cohn SM; Sleeman D
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Jun; 200(6):869-75. PubMed ID: 15922197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]