BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

448 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16928975)

  • 1. Rectal carcinoma: high-spatial-resolution MR imaging and T2 quantification in rectal cancer specimens.
    Stollfuss JC; Becker K; Sendler A; Seidl S; Settles M; Auer F; Beer A; Rummeny EJ; Woertler K
    Radiology; 2006 Oct; 241(1):132-41. PubMed ID: 16928975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rectal cancer: MR imaging in local staging--is gadolinium-based contrast material helpful?
    Vliegen RF; Beets GL; von Meyenfeldt MF; Kessels AG; Lemaire EE; van Engelshoven JM; Beets-Tan RG
    Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):179-88. PubMed ID: 15550372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preoperative 3T MR imaging of rectal cancer: local staging accuracy using a two-dimensional and three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence.
    Fütterer JJ; Yakar D; Strijk SP; Barentsz JO
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 18164156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Locally advanced rectal cancer: MR imaging for restaging after neoadjuvant radiation therapy with concomitant chemotherapy. Part II. What are the criteria to predict involved lymph nodes?
    Lahaye MJ; Beets GL; Engelen SM; Kessels AG; de Bruïne AP; Kwee HW; van Engelshoven JM; van de Velde CJ; Beets-Tan RG
    Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 19403848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of liver fat quantification at MR imaging: comparison of out-of-phase gradient-echo and fat-saturated fast spin-echo techniques--initial experience.
    Qayyum A; Goh JS; Kakar S; Yeh BM; Merriman RB; Coakley FV
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):507-11. PubMed ID: 16244259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Staging urinary bladder cancer: value of T1-weighted three-dimensional magnetization prepared-rapid gradient-echo and two-dimensional spin-echo sequences.
    Barentsz JO; Jager G; Mugler JP; Oosterhof G; Peters H; van Erning LT; Ruijs SH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 7998522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rectal cancer: comparison of accuracy of local-regional staging with two- and three-dimensional preoperative 3-T MR imaging.
    Kim H; Lim JS; Choi JY; Park J; Chung YE; Kim MJ; Choi E; Kim NK; Kim KW
    Radiology; 2010 Feb; 254(2):485-92. PubMed ID: 20093520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MR imaging correlates of intratumoral tissue types within colorectal liver metastases: a high-spatial-resolution fresh ex vivo radiologic-pathologic correlation study.
    Milot L; Guindi M; Gallinger S; Moulton CA; Brock KK; Dawson LA; Haider MA
    Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):747-54. PubMed ID: 20123902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MR imaging follow-up after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma: findings in 18 patients during first 6 months.
    Merkle EM; Nour SG; Lewin JS
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):1065-71. PubMed ID: 15914485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uterine tumors: comparison of 3D versus 2D T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging at 3.0 T--initial experience.
    Hori M; Kim T; Onishi H; Ueguchi T; Tatsumi M; Nakamoto A; Tsuboyama T; Tomoda K; Tomiyama N
    Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):154-63. PubMed ID: 21045182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: MR findings and value of T1-versus T2-weighted fast spin-echo images.
    Yasumoto M; Shibuya H; Takeda M; Korenaga T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):981-7. PubMed ID: 7726062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Locally advanced rectal cancer: added value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting tumor clearance of the mesorectal fascia after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy.
    Park MJ; Kim SH; Lee SJ; Jang KM; Rhim H
    Radiology; 2011 Sep; 260(3):771-80. PubMed ID: 21846762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging.
    Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Weikel W; Knopp MV; Schaeffer U; Brix G; Essig M; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Schönberg S; van Kaick G
    Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 8888254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dissected sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer patients: characterization with high-spatial-resolution 7-T MR imaging.
    Korteweg MA; Zwanenburg JJ; Hoogduin JM; van den Bosch MA; van Diest PJ; van Hillegersberg R; Eijkemans MJ; Mali WP; Luijten PR; Veldhuis WB
    Radiology; 2011 Oct; 261(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 21673230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conspicuity of tumors of the head and neck on fat-suppressed MR images: T2-weighted fast-spin-echo versus contrast-enhanced T1-weighted conventional spin-echo sequences.
    Dubin MD; Teresi LM; Bradley WG; Jordan JE; Pema PJ; Goergen SK; Tam JK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1213-21. PubMed ID: 7717234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mucinous versus nonmucinous rectal carcinomas: differentiation with MR imaging.
    Hussain SM; Outwater EK; Siegelman ES
    Radiology; 1999 Oct; 213(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 10540644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MR imaging of primary lymphoma of bone: variability of T2-weighted signal intensity.
    White LM; Schweitzer ME; Khalili K; Howarth DJ; Wunder JS; Bell RS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 May; 170(5):1243-7. PubMed ID: 9574594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography.
    Low RN; Sigeti JS; Francis IR; Weinman D; Bower B; Shimakawa A; Foo TK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 8310918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Locally advanced rectal cancer: MR imaging in prediction of response after preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy.
    Barbaro B; Fiorucci C; Tebala C; Valentini V; Gambacorta MA; Vecchio FM; Rizzo G; Coco C; Crucitti A; Ratto C; Bonomo L
    Radiology; 2009 Mar; 250(3):730-9. PubMed ID: 19244043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance imaging in suspected rectal cancer: determining tumor localization, stage, and sphincter-saving resectability at 3-Tesla-sustained high resolution.
    Winter L; Bruhn H; Langrehr J; Neuhaus P; Felix R; Hänninen LE
    Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 17453515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.