These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Framework guidelines for wound care. Fletcher J; Kopp P Prof Nurse; 2000 Nov; 16(2):917-21. PubMed ID: 12029871 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Practice and perception--a nationwide survey of therapy habits in sepsis. Brunkhorst FM; Engel C; Ragaller M; Welte T; Rossaint R; Gerlach H; Mayer K; John S; Stuber F; Weiler N; Oppert M; Moerer O; Bogatsch H; Reinhart K; Loeffler M; Hartog C; Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2719-25. PubMed ID: 18766100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Separating practice guidelines from pharmaceutical marketing. Eichacker PQ; Natanson C; Danner RL Crit Care Med; 2007 Dec; 35(12):2877-8; author reply 2878-80. PubMed ID: 18043217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Improving outcomes for severe sepsis and septic shock: tools for early identification of at-risk patients and treatment protocol implementation. Rivers EP; Ahrens T Crit Care Clin; 2008 Jul; 24(3 Suppl):S1-47. PubMed ID: 18634996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Sepsis (mis) management: the hazards of a faith-based approach. Siegel MD Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2929-30. PubMed ID: 18812793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle: 2018 update. Levy MM; Evans LE; Rhodes A Intensive Care Med; 2018 Jun; 44(6):925-928. PubMed ID: 29675566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of 7.5 years of Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines. Bakker J; Perner A; Timsit JF Intensive Care Med; 2015 Jan; 41(1):151-3. PubMed ID: 25351896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Bench-to-bedside review: the initial hemodynamic resuscitation of the septic patient according to Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines--does one size fit all? Perel A Crit Care; 2008; 12(5):223. PubMed ID: 18828870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Are laboratories following published recommendations for lupus anticoagulant testing? An international evaluation of practices. Moffat KA; Ledford-Kraemer MR; Plumhoff EA; McKay H; Nichols WL; Meijer P; Hayward CP Thromb Haemost; 2009 Jan; 101(1):178-84. PubMed ID: 19132206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Best practice guidelines: implementation and lessons learned. Saunders S; Petch C Perspectives; 2007; 31(3):24-31. PubMed ID: 18214336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Failure to implement evidence-based clinical guidelines for sepsis at the ED. De Miguel-Yanes JM; Andueza-Lillo JA; González-Ramallo VJ; Pastor L; Muñoz J Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Sep; 24(5):553-9. PubMed ID: 16938593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of computer-assisted European Best Practice Guideline implementation on adherence and target attainment: ORAMA results. Locatelli F; Covic A; Macdougall IC; Scherhag A; Wiecek A; J Nephrol; 2009; 22(5):662-74. PubMed ID: 19810000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ensuring consistency among evidence-based practice interventions. Mitchell C Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2008 Apr; 12(2):365-7. PubMed ID: 18390471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. College of Nurses of Ontario: bridging practice settings realities in LTC/Rehabilitation/Complex Continuing Care. Stec S Perspectives; 2007; 31(3):23. PubMed ID: 18214335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]