BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16930229)

  • 21. [Epidemiology of contact dermatitis: prevalence of sensitization to different allergens and associated factors].
    Bordel-Gómez MT; Miranda-Romero A; Castrodeza-Sanz J
    Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2010; 101(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 20109394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period.
    Pratt MD; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Zug K
    Dermatitis; 2004 Dec; 15(4):176-83. PubMed ID: 15842061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of previously patch-tested patients referred to a contact dermatitis clinic.
    Soni BP; Sherertz EF
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Mar; 8(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9066841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a mayo clinic 5-year retrospective review, january 1, 2001, through december 31, 2005.
    Davis MD; Scalf LA; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; El-Azhary RA; Rohlinger AL; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL; Connolly SM
    Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jan; 144(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 18209170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Allergic and non-allergic periorbital dermatitis: patch test results of the Information Network of the Departments of Dermatology during a 5-year period.
    Herbst RA; Uter W; Pirker C; Geier J; Frosch PJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 15291826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Contact sensitization to allergens in the Spanish standard series at Hospital Costa del Sol in Marbella, Spain: a retrospective study (2005-2010)].
    Aguilar-Bernier M; Bernal-Ruiz AI; Rivas-Ruiz F; Fernández-Morano MT; de Troya-Martín M
    Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2012 Apr; 103(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 21963222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Primin in the European standard patch test series for 20 years.
    Zachariae C; Engkilde K; Johansen JD; Menné T
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jun; 56(6):344-6. PubMed ID: 17577376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Patch test sensitization to Compositae mix, sesquiterpene-lactone mix, Compositae extracts, laurel leaf, Chlorophorin, Mansonone A, and dimethoxydalbergione.
    Kanerva L; Estlander T; Alanko K; Jolanki R
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Mar; 12(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 11244135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reproducibility of patch test results: a concurrent right-versus-left study using TRUE Test.
    Ale SI; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 15209812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. 20 Years of standard patch testing in an eczema population with focus on patients with multiple contact allergies.
    Carlsen BC; Menné T; Johansen JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Aug; 57(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 17627644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Frequency of contact allergy in German children and adolescents patch tested between 1995 and 2002: results from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology and the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
    Heine G; Schnuch A; Uter W; Worm M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):111-7. PubMed ID: 15479199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Strong allergic patch test reactions may indicate a general disposition for contact allergy.
    Brasch J; Schnuch A; Uter W;
    Allergy; 2006 Mar; 61(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 16436147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Result of standard patch test in patients suspected of having allergic contact dermatitis.
    Wongpiyabovorn J; Puvabanditsin P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Sep; 88 Suppl 4():S177-83. PubMed ID: 16623025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Contact allergy to fragrances].
    Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B; Swierczyńska-Machura D
    Med Pr; 2006; 57(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 17340985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prevalence of contact allergens in a Hispanic population.
    Collazo MH; Figueroa LD; Sánchez JL
    P R Health Sci J; 2008 Dec; 27(4):333-6. PubMed ID: 19069359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Allergic contact dermatitis in Iran.
    Kashani MN; Gorouhi F; Behnia F; Nazemi MJ; Dowlati Y; Firooz A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Mar; 52(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 15811031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contact dermatitis in the textile industry: a review of 72 patients.
    Soni BP; Sherertz EF
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1996 Dec; 7(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 8955486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Contact allergy in chronic eczematous lip dermatitis.
    Schena D; Fantuzzi F; Girolomoni G
    Eur J Dermatol; 2008; 18(6):688-92. PubMed ID: 18955202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for 2007-2008.
    Fransway AF; Zug KA; Belsito DV; Deleo VA; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Warshaw EM; Dekoven J; Zirwas M
    Dermatitis; 2013; 24(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 23340394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007.
    Wetter DA; Yiannias JA; Prakash AV; Davis MD; Farmer SA; el-Azhary RA
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Nov; 63(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 20643495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 66.