These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16930636)

  • 1. Neural correlates of differential retrieval orientation: Sustained and item-related components.
    Woodruff CC; Uncapher MR; Rugg MD
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(14):3000-10. PubMed ID: 16930636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modulation of the electrophysiological correlates of retrieval cue processing by the specificity of task demands.
    Johnson JD; Rugg MD
    Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1071(1):153-64. PubMed ID: 16413511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrieval orientation and the control of recollection.
    Herron JE; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):843-54. PubMed ID: 14511537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological correlates of retrieval processing: effects of consistent versus inconsistent retrieval demands.
    Johnson JD; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 18(9):1531-44. PubMed ID: 16989553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural correlates of retrieval orientation: effects of study-test similarity.
    Hornberger M; Morcom AM; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 16(7):1196-210. PubMed ID: 15453974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between study processing and the effects of cue congruency at retrieval: fMRI support for transfer appropriate processing.
    Park H; Rugg MD
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Apr; 18(4):868-75. PubMed ID: 17652467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI.
    de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of age on retrieval cue processing as revealed by ERPs.
    Morcom AM; Rugg MD
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1525-42. PubMed ID: 15246290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Process dissociation between contextual retrieval and item recognition.
    Weis S; Specht K; Klaver P; Tendolkar I; Willmes K; Ruhlmann J; Elger CE; Fernández G
    Neuroreport; 2004 Dec; 15(18):2729-33. PubMed ID: 15597043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Content-specificity of the neural correlates of recollection.
    Woodruff CC; Johnson JD; Uncapher MR; Rugg MD
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(7):1022-32. PubMed ID: 15769488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociating state and item components of recognition memory using fMRI.
    Donaldson DI; Petersen SE; Ollinger JM; Buckner RL
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jan; 13(1):129-42. PubMed ID: 11133316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The nature of memory related activity in early visual areas.
    Slotnick SD; Schacter DL
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(14):2874-86. PubMed ID: 16901520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The control of memory retrieval: insights from event-related potentials.
    Werkle-Bergner M; Mecklinger A; Kray J; Meyer P; Düzel E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):599-614. PubMed ID: 16099369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Animate and inanimate objects in human visual cortex: Evidence for task-independent category effects.
    Wiggett AJ; Pritchard IC; Downing PE
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Dec; 47(14):3111-7. PubMed ID: 19631673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. fMRI evidence of word frequency and strength effects in recognition memory.
    de Zubicaray GI; McMahon KL; Eastburn MM; Finnigan S; Humphreys MS
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):587-98. PubMed ID: 16099368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fragments of a larger whole: retrieval cues constrain observed neural correlates of memory encoding.
    Otten LJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Sep; 17(9):2030-8. PubMed ID: 17088375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional-anatomic study of episodic retrieval. II. Selective averaging of event-related fMRI trials to test the retrieval success hypothesis.
    Buckner RL; Koutstaal W; Schacter DL; Dale AM; Rotte M; Rosen BR
    Neuroimage; 1998 Apr; 7(3):163-75. PubMed ID: 9597658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of encoding manipulation on word-stem cued recall: an event-related potential study.
    Fay S; Isingrini M; Ragot R; Pouthas V
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):615-26. PubMed ID: 16099370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociating source memory decisions in the prefrontal cortex: fMRI of diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring.
    Gallo DA; McDonough IM; Scimeca J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 May; 22(5):955-69. PubMed ID: 19413478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retrieval from episodic memory: neural mechanisms of interference resolution.
    Wimber M; Rutschmann RM; Greenlee MW; Bäuml KH
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Mar; 21(3):538-49. PubMed ID: 18564040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.