These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16930898)

  • 41. Individual shedder status and the origin of touch DNA.
    Jansson L; Swensson M; Gifvars E; Hedell R; Forsberg C; Ansell R; Hedman J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jan; 56():102626. PubMed ID: 34781198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. DNA test--a forensic boon.
    Mohanty NK; Haldar S
    J Indian Med Assoc; 2006 Feb; 104(2):90-2, 94. PubMed ID: 16856590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Differences in SCSA outcome among boars with different sperm freezability.
    Hernández M; Roca J; Ballester J; Vázquez JM; Martínez EA; Johannisson A; Saravia F; Rodríguez-Martínez H
    Int J Androl; 2006 Dec; 29(6):583-91. PubMed ID: 17121656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. STR profiles from DNA samples with "undetected" or low quantifiler results.
    Cupples CM; Champagne JR; Lewis KE; Cruz TD
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jan; 54(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 19018932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The relative DNA-shedding propensity of the palm and finger surfaces.
    Oleiwi AA; Morris MR; Schmerer WM; Sutton R
    Sci Justice; 2015 Sep; 55(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 26385715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The implications of shedder status and background DNA on direct and secondary transfer in an attack scenario.
    Fonneløp AE; Ramse M; Egeland T; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():48-60. PubMed ID: 28363123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluating forensic biology results given source level propositions.
    Taylor D; Abarno D; Hicks T; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():54-67. PubMed ID: 26720813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Detectability of SGM Plus profiles in heart and lungs tissue samples incubated in different environments.
    Niemcunowicz-Janica A; Pepinski W; Janica JR; Skawronska M; Janica J; Koc-Zorawska E
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2008 Jan; 10(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 17698395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Secondary and subsequent DNA transfer during criminal investigation.
    Fonneløp AE; Egeland T; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():155-162. PubMed ID: 26005954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Concordance study between the AmpFlSTR MiniFiler PCR amplification kit and conventional STR typing kits.
    Hill CR; Kline MC; Mulero JJ; Lagacé RE; Chang CW; Hennessy LK; Butler JM
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):870-3. PubMed ID: 17553078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Direct comparison of post-28-cycle PCR purification and modified capillary electrophoresis methods with the 34-cycle "low copy number" (LCN) method for analysis of trace forensic DNA samples.
    Forster L; Thomson J; Kutranov S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Sep; 2(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 19083842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Developmental validation of reduced-size STR Miniplex primer sets.
    Opel KL; Chung DT; Drábek J; Butler JM; McCord BR
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Nov; 52(6):1263-71. PubMed ID: 18093061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. South Australian Aboriginal sub-population data for the nine AMPFlSTR Profiler Plus short tandem repeat (STR) loci.
    Taylor DA; Henry JM; Walsh SJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):e27-30. PubMed ID: 19083800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The next generation of DNA profiling--STR typing by multiplexed PCR--ion-pair RP LC-ESI time-of-flight MS.
    Pitterl F; Niederstätter H; Huber G; Zimmermann B; Oberacher H; Parson W
    Electrophoresis; 2008 Dec; 29(23):4739-50. PubMed ID: 19053072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The Achilles tendon as a DNA source for STR typing of highly decayed corpses.
    Roeper A; Reichert W; Mattern R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Dec; 173(2-3):103-6. PubMed ID: 17353106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Identification and separation of DNA mixtures using peak area information.
    Cowell RG; Lauritzen SL; Mortera J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Feb; 166(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 16650704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Commentary on: Budowle B, Onorato AJ, Callaghan TF, Della Manna A, Gross AM, Guerrieri RA, Luttman JC, McClure DL. Mixture interpretation: defining the relevant features for guidelines for the assessment of mixed DNA profiles in forensic casework. J Forensic Sci 2009;54(4):810-21.
    Gill P; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):265-8; author reply 269-72. PubMed ID: 20412159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A quadruplex real-time qPCR assay for the simultaneous assessment of total human DNA, human male DNA, DNA degradation and the presence of PCR inhibitors in forensic samples: a diagnostic tool for STR typing.
    Hudlow WR; Chong MD; Swango KL; Timken MD; Buoncristiani MR
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):108-25. PubMed ID: 19083806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Testing and evaluation of 43 "noncore" Y chromosome markers for forensic casework applications.
    Hanson EK; Berdos PN; Ballantyne J
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1298-314. PubMed ID: 17199615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Association between routine visits for dental checkup and self-perceived oral health in an adult population in Rio de Janeiro: the Pró-Saúde Study.
    Afonso-Souza G; Nadanovsky P; Chor D; Faerstein E; Werneck GL; Lopes CS
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Oct; 35(5):393-400. PubMed ID: 17822488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.