These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16931345)

  • 1. Monitoring of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement in clinical practice.
    El Maghraoui A; Achemlal L; Bezza A
    J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 16931345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry in daily clinical practice.
    El Maghraoui A; Do Santos Zounon AA; Jroundi I; Nouijai A; Ghazi M; Achemlal L; Bezza A; Tazi MA; Abouqual R
    Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):1742-8. PubMed ID: 15937633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sources of variability in bone mineral density measurements: implications for study design and analysis of bone loss.
    Nguyen TV; Sambrook PN; Eisman JA
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Jan; 12(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9240735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurement in daily practice.
    Lodder MC; Lems WF; Ader HJ; Marthinsen AE; van Coeverden SC; Lips P; Netelenbos JC; Dijkmans BA; Roos JC
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2004 Mar; 63(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 14962964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the skeletal status by peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the forearm: short-term precision in vivo and comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    Grampp S; Lang P; Jergas M; Glüer CC; Mathur A; Engelke K; Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Oct; 10(10):1566-76. PubMed ID: 8686514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual smallest detectable difference in bone mineral density measurements.
    Ravaud P; Reny JL; Giraudeau B; Porcher R; Dougados M; Roux C
    J Bone Miner Res; 1999 Aug; 14(8):1449-56. PubMed ID: 10457279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproducibility of DXA: potential impact on serial measurements and misclassification of osteoporosis.
    Phillipov G; Seaborn CJ; Phillips PJ
    Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 11305083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: overused, neglected, or just misunderstood?
    Laster AJ
    N C Med J; 2014; 75(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 24663138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of weight change on total body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: results from a clinical trial.
    Blake GM; Herd RJ; Patel R; Fogelman I
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(10):832-9. PubMed ID: 11199186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of computed digital absorptiometry and conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women.
    Fiter J; Nolla JM; Gómez-Vaquero C; Martínez-Aguilá D; Valverde J; Roig-Escofet D
    Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(7):565-9. PubMed ID: 11527054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A generalized least significant change for individuals measured on different DXA systems.
    Shepherd JA; Lu Y
    J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 17616413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in clinical practice and its trouble spots in bone mineral measurement].
    Hagino H
    Clin Calcium; 2004 Dec; 14(12):33-8. PubMed ID: 15577171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility of DXA absorptiometry: a model for bone loss estimates.
    Fuleihan GE; Testa MA; Angell JE; Porrino N; Leboff MS
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1004-14. PubMed ID: 7484275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA
    Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo short-term precision of hip structure analysis variables in comparison with bone mineral density using paired dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans from multi-center clinical trials.
    Khoo BC; Beck TJ; Qiao QH; Parakh P; Semanick L; Prince RL; Singer KP; Price RI
    Bone; 2005 Jul; 37(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 15869917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. DXA in vivo BMD methodology: an erroneous and misleading research and clinical gauge of bone mineral status, bone fragility, and bone remodelling.
    Bolotin HH
    Bone; 2007 Jul; 41(1):138-54. PubMed ID: 17481978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the longitudinal changes in quantitative ultrasound with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the four-year effects of hormone replacement therapy.
    Sahota O; San P; Cawte SA; Pearson D; Hosking DJ
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 10663359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of bone mineral density with dual x-ray absorptiometry for osteoporosis in children with bladder augmentation.
    Abeş M; Sarihan H; Madenci E
    J Pediatr Surg; 2003 Feb; 38(2):230-2. PubMed ID: 12596110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mandibular bone mineral density as a predictor of skeletal osteoporosis.
    Horner K; Devlin H; Alsop CW; Hodgkinson IM; Adams JE
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Nov; 69(827):1019-25. PubMed ID: 8958019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic value of estimated volumetric bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in osteoporosis.
    Peel NF; Eastell R
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Mar; 9(3):317-20. PubMed ID: 8191924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.