81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16931357)
1. Precision of periprosthetic bone mineral density measurements using Hologic Windows versus DOS-based analysis software.
Shetty NR; Hamer AJ; Stockley I; Eastell R; Wilkinson JM
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(3):363-6. PubMed ID: 16931357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pelvic periprosthetic bone mineral density measurement around cemented vs cementless acetabular prostheses.
Jayasuriya RL; Wilkinson JM
J Clin Densitom; 2014; 17(1):116-20. PubMed ID: 24161791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simulated change in body fatness affects Hologic QDR 4500A whole body and central DXA bone measures.
Evans EM; Mojtahedi MC; Kessinger RB; Misic MM
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 16931350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of body composition by bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in overweight/obese postmenopausal women.
Fakhrawi DH; Beeson L; Libanati C; Feleke D; Kim H; Quansah A; Darnell A; Lammi-Keefe CJ; Cordero-MacIntyre Z
J Clin Densitom; 2009; 12(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 19285894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cross calibration of Hologic QDR2000 and GE Lunar Prodigy for forearm bone mineral density measurements.
Pearson D; Horton B; Green DJ
J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 17584510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of body composition measurements obtained by two fan-beam DXA instruments.
Sakai Y; Ito H; Meno T; Numata M; Jingu S
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 16785080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantifying Pelvic Periprosthetic Bone Remodeling Using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Region-Free Analysis.
Parker AM; Yang L; Farzi M; Pozo JM; Frangi AF; Wilkinson JM
J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(4):480-485. PubMed ID: 28652104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Manufacture and evaluation of a spine phantom used in the cross-calibration of DXA bone densitometry].
Yang DZ; Shang JY; Song WZ; Chen J; Zhu D; Wang WZ
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2003 Jun; 25(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 12905736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of a new positioner on the precision of hip bone mineral density measurements.
Hans D; Duboeuf F; Schott AM; Horn S; Avioli LV; Drezner MK; Meunier PJ
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Aug; 12(8):1289-94. PubMed ID: 9258760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intersite comparison of the Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray bone densitometer.
Blake GM; Tong CM; Fogelman I
Br J Radiol; 1991 May; 64(761):440-6. PubMed ID: 2036569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone mineral density in the growing human mandible.
D'Amelio P; Panattoni GL; Di Stefano M; Isaia GC
J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 2000; 20(4):201-5. PubMed ID: 11354517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of bone strontium on BMD measurements.
Blake GM; Fogelman I
J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 17289524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Between-centre variability versus variability over time in DXA whole body measurements evaluated using a whole body phantom.
Louis O; Verlinde S; Thomas M; De Schepper J
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):431-4. PubMed ID: 16513312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DXA-generated Z-scores and T-scores may differ substantially and significantly in young adults.
Carey JJ; Delaney MF; Love TE; Richmond BJ; Cromer BA; Miller PD; Manilla-McIntosh M; Lewis SA; Thomas CL; Licata AA
J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(4):351-8. PubMed ID: 17662630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Body composition analysis by dual X-ray absorptiometry: in vivo and in vitro comparison of three different fan-beam instruments.
Aasen G; Fagertun H; Halse J
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2006; 66(8):659-66. PubMed ID: 17101558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and precision of bone mineral density and bone mineral content in excised rat humeri using fan beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Kastl S; Sommer T; Klein P; Hohenberger W; Engelke K
Bone; 2002 Jan; 30(1):243-6. PubMed ID: 11792592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of peri-prosthetic bone mineral density measurement using two different dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry systems.
Cohen B; Rushton N
Br J Radiol; 1994 Sep; 67(801):852-5. PubMed ID: 7953225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of high resolution dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry-region free analysis (DXA-RFA) to detect local periprosthetic bone remodeling events.
Wilkinson JM; Morris RM; Martin-Fernandez MA; Pozo JM; Frangi AF; Maheson M; Yang L
J Orthop Res; 2015 May; 33(5):712-6. PubMed ID: 25640686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The usefulness of dual energy X-ray and laser absorptiometry of the calcaneus versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of hip and spine in diagnosing manifest osteoporosis.
de Klerk G; van der Velde D; van der Palen J; van Bergeijk L; Hegeman JH
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Feb; 129(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 18825395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry-based assessment of male patients using standardized bone density values and a national reference database.
Goemaere S; Vanderschueren D; Kaufman JM; Reginster JY; Boutsen Y; Poriau S; Callens J; Raeman F; Depresseux G; Borghs H; Devogelaer JP; Boonen S; ;
J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 17289523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
