These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16931953)

  • 1. Nucleolar grade but not Fuhrman grade is applicable to papillary renal cell carcinoma.
    Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; William Jordan T; Delahunt B
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Sep; 30(9):1091-6. PubMed ID: 16931953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
    Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; Martignoni G; Eble JN; Jordan TW
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Jun; 31(6):957-60. PubMed ID: 17527087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma should be based on nucleolar prominence.
    Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; William Jordan T; Magi-Galluzzi C; Zhou M; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Aug; 35(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21716085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Morphologic typing of papillary renal cell carcinoma: comparison of growth kinetics and patient survival in 66 cases.
    Delahunt B; Eble JN; McCredie MR; Bethwaite PB; Stewart JH; Bilous AM
    Hum Pathol; 2001 Jun; 32(6):590-5. PubMed ID: 11431713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Histological subtyping and nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma and their implications for survival: a retrospective nation-wide study of 629 patients.
    Gudbjartsson T; Hardarson S; Petursdottir V; Thoroddsen A; Magnusson J; Einarsson GV
    Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 15964127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel tumor grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: prognostic utility and comparison with Fuhrman nuclear grade.
    Paner GP; Amin MB; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Moch H; Lyles RH
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1233-40. PubMed ID: 20679882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Papillary renal cell carcinoma: correlation of tumor grade and histologic characteristics with clinical outcome.
    Cornejo KM; Dong F; Zhou AG; Wu CL; Young RH; Braaten K; Sadow PM; Nielsen GP; Oliva E
    Hum Pathol; 2015 Oct; 46(10):1411-7. PubMed ID: 26297250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system: a multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
    Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Maffei N; Brunelli M; Novara G; Zanolla L; Pea M; Artibani W
    Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15573369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Percentage of high-grade carcinoma as a prognostic indicator in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
    Serrano MF; Katz M; Yan Y; Kibel AS; Humphrey PA
    Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 18484589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: histomorphologic characteristics and evaluation of conventional pathologic prognostic parameters in 145 cases.
    Amin MB; Paner GP; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Lyles RH; Moch H
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Dec; 32(12):1822-34. PubMed ID: 18813125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Collecting system invasion and Fuhrman grade but not tumor size facilitate prognostic stratification of patients with pT2 renal cell carcinoma.
    Brookman-May S; May M; Zigeuner R; Shariat SF; Scherr DS; Chromecki T; Moch H; Wild PJ; Mohamad-Al-Ali B; Cindolo L; Wieland WF; Schips L; De Cobelli O; Rocco B; Santoro L; De Nunzio C; Tubaro A; Coman I; Feciche B; Truss M; Dalpiaz O; Hohenfellner M; Gilfrich C; Wirth MP; Burger M; Pahernik S;
    J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2175-81. PubMed ID: 22014800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Morphological subtyping of papillary renal cell carcinoma: clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis.
    Yamashita S; Ioritani N; Oikawa K; Aizawa M; Endoh M; Arai Y
    Int J Urol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):679-83. PubMed ID: 17681054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The chromophobe tumor grading system is the preferred grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
    Finley DS; Shuch B; Said JW; Galliano G; Jeffries RA; Afifi AA; Castor B; Magyar C; Sadaat A; Kabbinavar FF; Belldegrun AS; Pantuck AJ
    J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2168-74. PubMed ID: 22014797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survival analysis of 130 patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma: prognostic utility of type 1 and type 2 subclassification.
    Pignot G; Elie C; Conquy S; Vieillefond A; Flam T; Zerbib M; Debré B; Amsellem-Ouazana D
    Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 17275070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma.
    Yoo C; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
    J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):486-91; discussion 491. PubMed ID: 18550101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prognostic impact of tumor size on pT2 renal cell carcinoma: an international multicenter experience.
    Klatte T; Patard JJ; Goel RH; Kleid MD; Guille F; Lobel B; Abbou CC; De La Taille A; Tostain J; Cindolo L; Altieri V; Ficarra V; Artibani W; Prayer-Galetti T; Allhoff EP; Schips L; Zigeuner R; Figlin RA; Kabbinavar FF; Pantuck AJ; Belldegrun AS; Lam JS
    J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):35-40; discussion 40. PubMed ID: 17521678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multi-institutional validation of a symptom based classification for renal cell carcinoma.
    Patard JJ; Leray E; Cindolo L; Ficarra V; Rodriguez A; De La Taille A; Tostain J; Artibani W; Abbou CC; Guillé F; Chopin DK; Lobel B
    J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):858-62. PubMed ID: 15310983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Morphologic subtyping of papillary renal cell carcinoma: correlation with prognosis and differential expression of MUC1 between the two subtypes.
    Leroy X; Zini L; Leteurtre E; Zerimech F; Porchet N; Aubert JP; Gosselin B; Copin MC
    Mod Pathol; 2002 Nov; 15(11):1126-30. PubMed ID: 12429790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma: meaning of histological typing and multifocality.
    Mejean A; Hopirtean V; Bazin JP; Larousserie F; Benoit H; Chrétien Y; Thiounn N; Dufour B
    J Urol; 2003 Sep; 170(3):764-7. PubMed ID: 12913693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma: Assessment of 241 patients with > 15-year follow-up.
    Lang H; Lindner V; de Fromont M; Molinié V; Letourneux H; Meyer N; Martin M; Jacqmin D
    Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 15611969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.