342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16931953)
1. Nucleolar grade but not Fuhrman grade is applicable to papillary renal cell carcinoma.
Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; William Jordan T; Delahunt B
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Sep; 30(9):1091-6. PubMed ID: 16931953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; Martignoni G; Eble JN; Jordan TW
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Jun; 31(6):957-60. PubMed ID: 17527087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma should be based on nucleolar prominence.
Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; William Jordan T; Magi-Galluzzi C; Zhou M; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Aug; 35(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21716085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Morphologic typing of papillary renal cell carcinoma: comparison of growth kinetics and patient survival in 66 cases.
Delahunt B; Eble JN; McCredie MR; Bethwaite PB; Stewart JH; Bilous AM
Hum Pathol; 2001 Jun; 32(6):590-5. PubMed ID: 11431713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Histological subtyping and nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma and their implications for survival: a retrospective nation-wide study of 629 patients.
Gudbjartsson T; Hardarson S; Petursdottir V; Thoroddsen A; Magnusson J; Einarsson GV
Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 15964127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel tumor grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: prognostic utility and comparison with Fuhrman nuclear grade.
Paner GP; Amin MB; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Moch H; Lyles RH
Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1233-40. PubMed ID: 20679882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Papillary renal cell carcinoma: correlation of tumor grade and histologic characteristics with clinical outcome.
Cornejo KM; Dong F; Zhou AG; Wu CL; Young RH; Braaten K; Sadow PM; Nielsen GP; Oliva E
Hum Pathol; 2015 Oct; 46(10):1411-7. PubMed ID: 26297250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system: a multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Maffei N; Brunelli M; Novara G; Zanolla L; Pea M; Artibani W
Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15573369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Percentage of high-grade carcinoma as a prognostic indicator in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Serrano MF; Katz M; Yan Y; Kibel AS; Humphrey PA
Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 18484589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: histomorphologic characteristics and evaluation of conventional pathologic prognostic parameters in 145 cases.
Amin MB; Paner GP; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Lyles RH; Moch H
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Dec; 32(12):1822-34. PubMed ID: 18813125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Collecting system invasion and Fuhrman grade but not tumor size facilitate prognostic stratification of patients with pT2 renal cell carcinoma.
Brookman-May S; May M; Zigeuner R; Shariat SF; Scherr DS; Chromecki T; Moch H; Wild PJ; Mohamad-Al-Ali B; Cindolo L; Wieland WF; Schips L; De Cobelli O; Rocco B; Santoro L; De Nunzio C; Tubaro A; Coman I; Feciche B; Truss M; Dalpiaz O; Hohenfellner M; Gilfrich C; Wirth MP; Burger M; Pahernik S;
J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2175-81. PubMed ID: 22014800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Morphological subtyping of papillary renal cell carcinoma: clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis.
Yamashita S; Ioritani N; Oikawa K; Aizawa M; Endoh M; Arai Y
Int J Urol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):679-83. PubMed ID: 17681054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The chromophobe tumor grading system is the preferred grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
Finley DS; Shuch B; Said JW; Galliano G; Jeffries RA; Afifi AA; Castor B; Magyar C; Sadaat A; Kabbinavar FF; Belldegrun AS; Pantuck AJ
J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2168-74. PubMed ID: 22014797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survival analysis of 130 patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma: prognostic utility of type 1 and type 2 subclassification.
Pignot G; Elie C; Conquy S; Vieillefond A; Flam T; Zerbib M; Debré B; Amsellem-Ouazana D
Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 17275070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma.
Yoo C; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):486-91; discussion 491. PubMed ID: 18550101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic impact of tumor size on pT2 renal cell carcinoma: an international multicenter experience.
Klatte T; Patard JJ; Goel RH; Kleid MD; Guille F; Lobel B; Abbou CC; De La Taille A; Tostain J; Cindolo L; Altieri V; Ficarra V; Artibani W; Prayer-Galetti T; Allhoff EP; Schips L; Zigeuner R; Figlin RA; Kabbinavar FF; Pantuck AJ; Belldegrun AS; Lam JS
J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):35-40; discussion 40. PubMed ID: 17521678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multi-institutional validation of a symptom based classification for renal cell carcinoma.
Patard JJ; Leray E; Cindolo L; Ficarra V; Rodriguez A; De La Taille A; Tostain J; Artibani W; Abbou CC; Guillé F; Chopin DK; Lobel B
J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):858-62. PubMed ID: 15310983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morphologic subtyping of papillary renal cell carcinoma: correlation with prognosis and differential expression of MUC1 between the two subtypes.
Leroy X; Zini L; Leteurtre E; Zerimech F; Porchet N; Aubert JP; Gosselin B; Copin MC
Mod Pathol; 2002 Nov; 15(11):1126-30. PubMed ID: 12429790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma: meaning of histological typing and multifocality.
Mejean A; Hopirtean V; Bazin JP; Larousserie F; Benoit H; Chrétien Y; Thiounn N; Dufour B
J Urol; 2003 Sep; 170(3):764-7. PubMed ID: 12913693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma: Assessment of 241 patients with > 15-year follow-up.
Lang H; Lindner V; de Fromont M; Molinié V; Letourneux H; Meyer N; Martin M; Jacqmin D
Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 15611969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]