273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16933199)
1. [Histopathologic quality of prostate core biopsy specimens: comparison of an MR-compatible biopsy needle and a ferromagnetic biopsy needle used for ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy].
Franiel T; Fritzsche F; Staack A; Rost J; Hamm B; Beyersdorff D
Rofo; 2006 Dec; 178(12):1212-8. PubMed ID: 16933199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR-guided biopsy of the prostate: comparison of diagnostic specimen quality with 18 G and 16 G biopsy needles.
Durmus T; Goldmann U; Baur AD; Huppertz A; Schwenke C; Hamm B; Franiel T
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e749-54. PubMed ID: 24034834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of diagnostic quality of kidney biopsy obtained using 16G and 18G needles in patients with diffuse renal disease.
Arora K; Punia RS; D'Cruz S
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2012 Jan; 23(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 22237225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Questionnaire based evaluation of prostate biopsy complication comparing different bioptic schemes].
Damiano R; Oliva A; Cantiello F; Esposito C; Perdonà S; De Sio M; Bitonti M; Sacco R; D'Armiento M
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2003 Mar; 75(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 12741345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Functional capacity of MRI-compatible biopsy needles in comparison with ferromagnetic biopsy needles. In vitro studies].
Langen HJ; Kugel H; Ortmann M; Noack M; de Rochemont RM; Landwehr P
Rofo; 2001 Jul; 173(7):658-62. PubMed ID: 11512240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is bigger better? A retrospective analysis of native renal biopsies with 16 Gauge versus 18 Gauge automatic needles.
Mai J; Yong J; Dixson H; Makris A; Aravindan A; Suranyi MG; Wong J
Nephrology (Carlton); 2013 Jul; 18(7):525-30. PubMed ID: 23639213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI-guided breast biopsy: clinical experience with 14-gauge stainless steel core biopsy needle.
Chen X; Lehman CD; Dee KE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Apr; 182(4):1075-80. PubMed ID: 15039191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies.
Anastasiadis AG; Lichy MP; Nagele U; Kuczyk MA; Merseburger AS; Hennenlotter J; Corvin S; Sievert KD; Claussen CD; Stenzl A; Schlemmer HP
Eur Urol; 2006 Oct; 50(4):738-48; discussion 748-9. PubMed ID: 16630688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of prostate voxels identified as suspicious of malignancy on three-dimensional (1)H MR spectroscopic imaging in patients with abnormal digital rectal examination or raised prostate specific antigen level of 4-10 ng/ml.
Kumar V; Jagannathan NR; Kumar R; Thulkar S; Gupta SD; Hemal AK; Gupta NP
NMR Biomed; 2007 Feb; 20(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 16894640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does transrectal ultrasound guided eight-core prostate biopsy improve cancer detection rates in patients with prostate-specific antigen levels of 4.1-10 ng/mL?
Yamamoto S; Ito T; Aizawa T; Noda K; Umezu K; Ohtsuru N; Hata K
Int J Urol; 2004 Jun; 11(6):386-91. PubMed ID: 15157207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective randomized trial of three different sizes of core-cutting needle for renal transplant biopsy.
Nicholson ML; Wheatley TJ; Doughman TM; White SA; Morgan JD; Veitch PS; Furness PN
Kidney Int; 2000 Jul; 58(1):390-5. PubMed ID: 10886586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naïve men with elevated prostate specific antigen.
Quentin M; Blondin D; Arsov C; Schimmöller L; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Albers P; Antoch G; Rabenalt R
J Urol; 2014 Nov; 192(5):1374-9. PubMed ID: 24866597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The long core needle with an end-cut technique for prostate biopsy: does it really have advantages when compared with standard needles?
Ozden E; Göğüş C; Tulunay O; Baltaci S
Eur Urol; 2004 Mar; 45(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 15036672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Significance of routine transition zone biopsies in Japanese men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies.
Miyake H; Kurahashi T; Muramaki M; Yamanak K; Hara I
Int J Urol; 2005 Nov; 12(11):964-8. PubMed ID: 16351652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transrectal ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate. A comparison between the standard 1.2-mm needle and three thinner needles.
Norberg M; Busch C; Stavinoha J; Scardino PT; Magnusson A
Acta Radiol; 1994 Sep; 35(5):463-7. PubMed ID: 8086255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: initial results.
Beyersdorff D; Winkel A; Hamm B; Lenk S; Loening SA; Taupitz M
Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):576-81. PubMed ID: 15616117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Needle core length is a quality indicator of systematic transperineal prostate biopsy.
Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Novella G; Cerruto MA; Galfano A; Novara G; Pea M; Artibani W
Eur Urol; 2006 Aug; 50(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 16448740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantification of prostate deformation due to needle insertion during TRUS-guided biopsy: comparison of hand-held and mechanically stabilized systems.
De Silva T; Fenster A; Bax J; Romagnoli C; Izawa J; Samarabandu J; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 21520885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sixteen gauge needles improve specimen quality but not cancer detection rate in transrectal ultrasound-guided 10-core prostate biopsies.
Inal GH; Oztekin VC; Uğurlu O; Kosan M; Akdemir O; Cetinkaya M
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2008; 11(3):270-3. PubMed ID: 18521101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
