These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16933423)
1. A sex difference in visual influence on heard speech. Irwin JR; Whalen DH; Fowler CA Percept Psychophys; 2006 May; 68(4):582-92. PubMed ID: 16933423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children. Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual speech alters the discrimination and identification of non-intact auditory speech in children with hearing loss. Jerger S; Damian MF; McAlpine RP; Abdi H Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 94():127-137. PubMed ID: 28167003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Brain activity during audiovisual speech perception: an fMRI study of the McGurk effect. Jones JA; Callan DE Neuroreport; 2003 Jun; 14(8):1129-33. PubMed ID: 12821795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do you see what you are hearing? Cross-modal effects of speech sounds on lipreading. Baart M; Vroomen J Neurosci Lett; 2010 Mar; 471(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 20080146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Temporal constraints on the McGurk effect. Munhall KG; Gribble P; Sacco L; Ward M Percept Psychophys; 1996 Apr; 58(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 8935896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Audiovisual speech perception in children with developmental language disorder in degraded listening conditions. Meronen A; Tiippana K; Westerholm J; Ahonen T J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 56(1):211-21. PubMed ID: 22653918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. McGurk effect in non-English listeners: few visual effects for Japanese subjects hearing Japanese syllables of high auditory intelligibility. Sekiyama K; Tohkura Y J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1797-805. PubMed ID: 1960275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Children use visual speech to compensate for non-intact auditory speech. Jerger S; Damian MF; Tye-Murray N; Abdi H J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Oct; 126():295-312. PubMed ID: 24974346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual and audiovisual speech perception with color and gray-scale facial images. Jordan TR; McCotter MV; Thomas SM Percept Psychophys; 2000 Oct; 62(7):1394-404. PubMed ID: 11143451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Facial identity and facial speech processing: familiar faces and voices in the McGurk effect. Walker S; Bruce V; O'Malley C Percept Psychophys; 1995 Nov; 57(8):1124-33. PubMed ID: 8539088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integral processing of visual place and auditory voicing information during phonetic perception. Green KP; Kuhl PK J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):278-88. PubMed ID: 1826317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cross-modal Informational Masking of Lipreading by Babble. Myerson J; Spehar B; Tye-Murray N; Van Engen K; Hale S; Sommers MS Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):346-54. PubMed ID: 26474981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cultural and linguistic factors in audiovisual speech processing: the McGurk effect in Chinese subjects. Sekiyama K Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jan; 59(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 9038409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]