124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16933532)
1. In search of a working length.
Liewehr FR
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2006 Jul; 18(6):354-5. PubMed ID: 16933532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Advancements in electronic root length measuring.
Kaufman AY; Slutzky-Goldberg I; Sahar-Helft S
Alpha Omegan; 2004 Dec; 97(4):62-74. PubMed ID: 15651584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Working length in root canal fillings.
Pagan JC; Santa CA; Alvarez JA
N Y State Dent J; 1993 Nov; 59(9):41-3. PubMed ID: 8247456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Dental radiography during root canal measurement].
Muraoka H
Shikai Tenbo; 1985 Sep; 66(3):658-61. PubMed ID: 3868139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Endodontic management of the mandibular second molar.
Warren RK
Dent Today; 2009 Feb; 28(2):118, 120, 122 passim. PubMed ID: 19275082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a digital measurement tool to estimate working length in endodontics.
Lamus F; Katz JO; Glaros AG
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2001 Feb; 2(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 12167941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mandibular first molars with three mesial canals.
Mortman RE; Ahn S
Gen Dent; 2003; 51(6):549-51. PubMed ID: 15055654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endodontic length determination--what lengths should we go to?
Robinson S; Brunton PA
Dent Update; 2008 Dec; 35(10):678-80, 682-3. PubMed ID: 19192689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Managing severe canal curvatures and apical impediments: an endodontic case study.
Buchanan LS
Dent Today; 2005 Apr; 24(4):124, 126, 128-31. PubMed ID: 15884620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of preflaring on working length determination: an in vivo study.
Fallahdoost A; Namazikhah MS; Sheikholeslaami M; Tavakkoli K
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Dec; 36(12):951-3. PubMed ID: 19186660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Establishing endodontic working length: a comparison of radiographic and electronic methods.
Tidmarsh BG; Sherson W; Stalker NL
N Z Dent J; 1985 Jul; 81(365):93-6. PubMed ID: 3865073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Proportional length determination: mathematical method.
Pink FE; Sachs E
Gen Dent; 1994; 42(5):428-31; quiz 433-4. PubMed ID: 7489875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Electronic conductometry in endodontics. A developing technique].
António PS; Leopoldo FN; Carmen LP
Rev Port Estomatol Cir Maxilofac; 1991; 31(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 2041976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Pulp chamber morphology: basic research leads to clinical technique.
Deutsch AS
Dent Today; 2005 Mar; 24(3):124, 126-7. PubMed ID: 15816673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Tooth anatomy risk factors influencing root canal working length accessibility.
Tang L; Sun TQ; Gao XJ; Zhou XD; Huang DM
Int J Oral Sci; 2011 Jul; 3(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 21789962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Proper techniques for accessing root canal systems.
Kulild JC
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2006 Sep; 18(8):471, 473. PubMed ID: 17061683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The ability of root ZX apex locator to reduce the frequency of overestimated radiographic working length.
ElAyouti A; Weiger R; Löst C
J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 11833683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determining the working length for root canal preparations by means of digital radiography.
Kassak H
Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Jan; 2(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 11351453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Experimental study on the differences between the radiographic apex and the apical foramen in the incisors (1)].
Ruiz de Temiño Malo P; Kessler Nieto F; Lopez-Escobar Benavides E; Martinez Frego MJ; Oteo Calatayud C
Rev Actual Estomatol Esp; 1986 Apr; 46(354):31-4, 37-40. PubMed ID: 3466249
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Tooth length determination: a review.
Katz A; Tamse A; Kaufman AY
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Aug; 72(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 1923402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
