These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16933767)

  • 1. Increased sensitivity to differentially diagnostic answers using familiar materials: implications for confirmation bias.
    McKenzie CR
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Apr; 34(3):577-88. PubMed ID: 16933767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Insensitivity and oversensitivity to answer diagnosticity in hypothesis testing.
    Rusconi P; McKenzie CR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2443-64. PubMed ID: 23679127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mad enough to see the other side: anger and the search for disconfirming information.
    Young MJ; Tiedens LZ; Jung H; Tsai MH
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Jan; 25(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 21432653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confirmation biases across the psychosis continuum: the contribution of hypersalient evidence-hypothesis matches.
    Balzan R; Delfabbro P; Galletly C; Woodward T
    Br J Clin Psychol; 2013 Mar; 52(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 23398112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preferences for different questions when testing hypotheses in an abstract task: positivity does play a role, asymmetry does not.
    Cherubini P; Rusconi P; Russo S; Di Bari S; Sacchi S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jun; 134(2):162-74. PubMed ID: 20223439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Confirming expectations in asymmetric and symmetric social hypothesis testing.
    Rusconi P; Sacchi S; Toscano A; Cherubini P
    Exp Psychol; 2012 Jan; 59(5):243-50. PubMed ID: 22580410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Featuring familiarity: how a familiar feature instantiation influences categorization.
    Hannah SD; Brooks LR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Dec; 63(4):263-75. PubMed ID: 20025385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Information selection and use in hypothesis testing: what is a good question, and what is a good answer?
    Slowiaczek LM; Klayman J; Sherman SJ; Skov RB
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Jul; 20(4):392-405. PubMed ID: 1495401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A familiarity disadvantage for remembering specific images of faces.
    Armann RG; Jenkins R; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):571-80. PubMed ID: 26594877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential sensitivity for viewpoint between familiar and unfamiliar faces in human visual cortex.
    Ewbank MP; Andrews TJ
    Neuroimage; 2008 May; 40(4):1857-70. PubMed ID: 18343161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].
    Amato L; Colais P; Davoli M; Ferroni E; Fusco D; Minozzi S; Moirano F; Sciattella P; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Perucci CA
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. PubMed ID: 23851286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robust representations for face recognition: the power of averages.
    Burton AM; Jenkins R; Hancock PJ; White D
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Nov; 51(3):256-84. PubMed ID: 16198327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. People got lost in solving a set of similar problems.
    Huang F; Zhao Q; Zhou Z; Luo J
    Neuroimage; 2019 Feb; 186():192-199. PubMed ID: 30449716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cattle discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics by using only head visual cues.
    Coulon M; Baudoin C; Heyman Y; Deputte BL
    Anim Cogn; 2011 Mar; 14(2):279-90. PubMed ID: 21132446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unfamiliar faces are not faces: evidence from a matching task.
    Megreya AM; Burton AM
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jun; 34(4):865-76. PubMed ID: 17063917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The speed of recognition of personally familiar faces.
    Ramon M; Caharel S; Rossion B
    Perception; 2011; 40(4):437-49. PubMed ID: 21805919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expression influences the recognition of familiar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Perception; 2004; 33(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 15222388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Drawing a distinction between familiar and unfamiliar voice processing: A review of neuropsychological, clinical and empirical findings.
    Stevenage SV
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jul; 116(Pt B):162-178. PubMed ID: 28694095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The hard-won benefits of familiarity in visual search: naturally familiar brand logos are found faster.
    Qin XA; Koutstaal W; Engel SA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):914-30. PubMed ID: 24510424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.