These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16933772)

  • 1. Two-component theory of the suffix effect: contrary evidence.
    Bloom LC
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Apr; 34(3):648-67. PubMed ID: 16933772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-component theory of the suffix effect: contrary findings.
    Bloom LC; Watkins MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Nov; 25(6):1452-74. PubMed ID: 10605831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Serial recall of two-voice lists: implications for theories of auditory recency and suffix effects.
    Greene RL
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jan; 19(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 2017031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Children's suffix effects for verbal working memory reflect phonological coding and perceptual grouping.
    Lowenstein JH; Cribb C; Shell P; Yuan Y; Nittrouer S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Jul; 183():276-294. PubMed ID: 30933869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression: is it a suffix effect?
    Hanley JR; Hayes A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):482-7. PubMed ID: 21928934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression is a suffix effect even with five-item lists.
    Hanley JR; Shah N
    Memory; 2012 Jul; 20(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 22497740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effect.
    Hanley JR; Bourgaize J
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):841-848. PubMed ID: 29600481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Manipulations of irrelevant information: suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech.
    Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC; Neath I
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 10881609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Top-down processing and the suffix effect in young and older adults.
    Pilotti M; Beyer T; Yasunami M
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 11958358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Grouping in primary memory: the case of the compound suffix.
    LeCompte DC; Watkins MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Jan; 21(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 7876775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adapting to an irrelevant item in an immediate recall task.
    Watkins MJ; Sechler ES
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Nov; 17(6):682-92. PubMed ID: 2811665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Suffix interference in the recall of linguistically coherent speech.
    Balota DA; Cowan N; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 May; 16(3):446-56. PubMed ID: 2140403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Post-categorical processing and attenuation of the auditory suffix: evidence from both immediate and delayed suffixes.
    Miles C; Westley DP; Buller MJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1995 Sep; 89(3):261-82. PubMed ID: 7572269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Capturing the suffix: cognitive streaming in immediate serial recall.
    Nicholls AP; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):12-28. PubMed ID: 11827075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Echoic and retrieval accounts of the long-term modality effect tested using the suffix procedure.
    Huang ST; Glenberg AM
    Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(4):453-70. PubMed ID: 3812815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can the irrelevant speech effect turn into a stimulus suffix effect?
    Schlittmeier SJ; Hellbrück J; Klatte M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 18421641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Acoustic memory of the speech evoked by a 22-channel cochlear implant].
    Kumakawa K
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1991 Aug; 94(8):1136-41. PubMed ID: 1960594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring the suffix effect in serial visuospatial short-term memory.
    Parmentier FB; Tremblay S; Jones DM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Apr; 11(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 15260195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suffix effects and intrusion errors in young and elderly subjects.
    Greenhut-Wertz J; Manning SK
    Exp Aging Res; 1995; 21(2):173-90. PubMed ID: 7628510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Voice-specific information and the 20-second delayed-suffix effect.
    Balota DA; Duchek JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Oct; 12(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 2945897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.