222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16935017)
1. [How to improve assisted reproductive techniques results? Biological aspects].
Devaux A; Lévy R
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Sep; 34(9):781-5. PubMed ID: 16935017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive factors for embryo implantation potential.
Borini A; Lagalla C; Cattoli M; Sereni E; Sciajno R; Flamigni C; Coticchio G
Reprod Biomed Online; 2005 May; 10(5):653-68. PubMed ID: 15949227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Human blastocyst morphological quality is significantly improved in embryos classified as fast on day 3 (>or=10 cells), bringing into question current embryological dogma.
Luna M; Copperman AB; Duke M; Ezcurra D; Sandler B; Barritt J
Fertil Steril; 2008 Feb; 89(2):358-63. PubMed ID: 17531231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: state of the art.
Basille C; Frydman R; El Aly A; Hesters L; Fanchin R; Tachdjian G; Steffann J; LeLorc'h M; Achour-Frydman N
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Jul; 145(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 19411132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of laser-assisted hatching and acidified Tyrode's hatching by evaluation of blastocyst development rates in sibling embryos: a prospective randomized trial.
Jones AE; Wright G; Kort HI; Straub RJ; Nagy ZP
Fertil Steril; 2006 Feb; 85(2):487-91. PubMed ID: 16595232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Sequential assessment of individually cultured embryos in IVF].
Guérif F; Poindron J; Bidault R; Gasnier O; Cadoret V; Saussereau MH; Royère D
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Sep; 34(9):801-7. PubMed ID: 16962809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of chromosomal abnormalities on preimplantation embryo development.
Rubio C; Rodrigo L; Mercader A; Mateu E; Buendía P; Pehlivan T; Viloria T; De los Santos MJ; Simón C; Remohí J; Pellicer A
Prenat Diagn; 2007 Aug; 27(8):748-56. PubMed ID: 17546708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reduction of the multiple pregnancy rate in a preimplantation genetic diagnosis programme after introduction of single blastocyst transfer and cryopreservation of blastocysts biopsied on day 3.
El-Toukhy T; Kamal A; Wharf E; Grace J; Bolton V; Khalaf Y; Braude P
Hum Reprod; 2009 Oct; 24(10):2642-8. PubMed ID: 19567414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of embryo developmental potential and pregnancy based on early stage morphological characteristics.
Sjöblom P; Menezes J; Cummins L; Mathiyalagan B; Costello MF
Fertil Steril; 2006 Oct; 86(4):848-61. PubMed ID: 17027355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Laser assisted hatching: Rouen University Hospital outcomes].
Blessmann-Roset J; Rives N; Clavier B; Milazzo JP; Mazurier S; Mousset-Siméon N; Macé B
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009 Apr; 37(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 19346148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Late stages of embryo progression are a much better predictor of clinical pregnancy than early cleavage in intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization cycles with blastocyst-stage transfer.
Rehman KS; Bukulmez O; Langley M; Carr BR; Nackley AC; Doody KM; Doody KJ
Fertil Steril; 2007 May; 87(5):1041-52. PubMed ID: 17336973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vitrification of preimplantation genetically diagnosed human blastocysts and its contribution to the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle by using a closed device.
Escribá MJ; Zulategui JF; Galán A; Mercader A; Remohí J; de los Santos MJ
Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):840-6. PubMed ID: 17681342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Oocyte and embryo quality: do the apoptotic markers have a place in the preimplantation genetic diagnostic?].
Haouzi D; De Vos J; Loup V; Assou S; Gasca S; Reyftmann L; Klein B; Hamamah S
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008; 36(7-8):730-42. PubMed ID: 18644743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of assisted reproductive technology in the management of recurrent pregnancy loss.
Go KJ; Patel JC; Cunningham DL
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes; 2009 Dec; 16(6):459-63. PubMed ID: 19838112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is there a place for biochemical embryonic preimplantational screening?
Krüssel JS; Huang HY; Hirchenhain J; Bielfeld P; Cupisti S; Jeremias L; Polan ML
J Reprod Fertil Suppl; 2000; 55():147-59. PubMed ID: 10889844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimizing the number of blastocyst stage embryos to transfer on day 5 or 6 in women 38 years of age and older: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database study.
Stern JE; Goldman MB; Hatasaka H; MacKenzie TA; Racowsky C; Surrey ES;
Fertil Steril; 2009 Jan; 91(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 18222441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sequential embryo assessment outperforms investigator-driven morphological assessment at selecting a good quality blastocyst.
Neuber E; Mahutte NG; Arici A; Sakkas D
Fertil Steril; 2006 Mar; 85(3):794-6. PubMed ID: 16500367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidies in assisted reproduction.
Verlinsky Y; Kuliev A
Minerva Ginecol; 2004 Jun; 56(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 15258531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of reduced oxygen concentrations on the outcome of in vitro fertilization.
Kea B; Gebhardt J; Watt J; Westphal LM; Lathi RB; Milki AA; Behr B
Fertil Steril; 2007 Jan; 87(1):213-6. PubMed ID: 17081523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of sperm morphology on preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles outcome.
Dubey A; Dayal MB; Frankfurter D; Balazy P; Peak D; Gindoff PR
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jun; 89(6):1665-9. PubMed ID: 17727848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]